Skip to main content

Security report for dd.lv

Dd studio · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dd studio is a small creative agency specializing in multimedia presentations, animations, and exhibition design primarily for cultural institutions and museums in Latvia and some international clients. Their portfolio demonstrates a focus on museum exhibitions, digital storytelling, and interactive multimedia programs. The website is professionally designed with a clear showcase of their projects, targeting cultural organizations and governmental bodies seeking specialized multimedia services. Technically, the site uses older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.11.1 and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. However, there is a lack of modern security headers and no visible privacy or cookie policies, indicating gaps in privacy compliance. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but the domain appears legitimate with consistent branding and no suspicious content. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and presents a moderate security posture with room for improvement in privacy and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dd.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dd studio operates in a niche market segment focusing on cultural and museum multimedia content creation. Their business model revolves around providing tailored digital presentations, animations, and exhibition designs to museums, cultural centers, and governmental clients. The company appears to have a stable regional presence in Latvia with some international outreach, particularly in Azerbaijan. The absence of contact details and privacy policies on the website may limit direct customer engagement and trust signals. The use of Google Analytics suggests some level of digital marketing and user behavior analysis, but privacy compliance is weak. The company’s portfolio and consistent branding indicate a focused and professional approach, though the small size and limited online presence suggest a boutique operation rather than a large enterprise.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. It uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.11.1) introduces potential vulnerabilities. There is no evidence of privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting the ability to report security issues. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in security headers, library updates, and privacy compliance to enhance its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  5. Regularly monitor WHOIS data and domain registration status to ensure domain legitimacy and timely renewals.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dd studio
Description
Dd studio appears to be a creative studio specializing in digital presentations, animations, multimedia programs, and exhibition design primarily for museums, cultural institutions, and governmental organizations. Their portfolio includes projects for Latvian museums, cultural centers, and international clients such as Azerbaijan's cultural ministries.
Key services
Digital presentations and animations, Exhibition and museum exposition design, Multimedia programs and interactive installations, Graphic and environmental design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.1, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links explicitly provided.
  4. Website uses outdated jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  5. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking without visible privacy compliance.
  6. Content is focused on cultural and museum multimedia projects, safe for general audiences.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  9. Site branding is consistent and professional with a clear portfolio showcase.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a minimal technology stack with jQuery 1.11.1 and Google Analytics. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta viewport settings for a fixed width of 1200px, indicating limited mobile responsiveness. CSS and JavaScript are loaded via minified files. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with empty meta title, keywords, and description tags. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but dated, with opportunities for modernization and improved mobile and SEO optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dd.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dd.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.