Skip to main content

Security report for dcpr.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

62/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website dcpr.cz appears to be a small Czech site currently offline or under maintenance, as indicated by the message 'Stránky jsou mimo provoz.' The site uses Joomla CMS and MooTools JavaScript library, hosted on cesky-hosting.eu. There is minimal content available, no visible contact information, privacy policies, or terms of service. The login form is present but lacks visible advanced security features such as CSRF tokens. The domain is registered since 2014, consistent with a small organization or business in the Czech Republic. Overall, the site shows low digital maturity and limited business information, which impacts trust and credibility. Technically, the site uses an older CMS and JavaScript framework, with no evidence of modern security headers or HTTPS enforcement in the provided data. The performance and mobile optimization appear basic. No analytics or marketing tools are detected. Security posture is weak due to lack of visible security best practices and policies. The security evaluation highlights the absence of HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and privacy compliance mechanisms. No critical vulnerabilities are visible from the provided data, but the lack of security controls and policies is a concern. The site does not appear to be blocked by any WAF or security challenge. Overall risk is moderate due to minimal content and weak security posture. Strategic improvements in security, privacy compliance, and content quality are recommended to enhance trust and operational readiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dcpr.cz

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain dcpr.cz is registered since 2014 and hosted on a Czech hosting provider, indicating a local small business or organization. The website title 'Název centra' and the login form suggest it may be an internal or member-only portal, possibly for a center or organization abbreviated as CPRŽ. No public business information, contact details, or services are disclosed, limiting competitive and market positioning analysis. The lack of privacy and cookie policies and minimal content suggest low digital marketing maturity. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries. The business model appears to be closed-access or internal, with no public-facing e-commerce or service offerings. Growth indicators and revenue streams cannot be assessed from the available data.

Security posture

The website currently lacks visible HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. The login form does not show advanced security measures such as CSRF tokens or multi-factor authentication prompts. No privacy or security policies are published, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. The site uses Joomla CMS, which requires regular updates to mitigate known vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is weak, exposing the site to potential risks if it becomes active again without improvements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with valid SSL/TLS certificates and enforce HTTPS redirects site-wide.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enhance login form security by adding CSRF protection and considering multi-factor authentication.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Regularly update Joomla CMS and all plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla, MooTools
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently offline or under maintenance as indicated by the message 'Stránky jsou mimo provoz.'
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Login form present but no visible advanced security features.
  4. Minimal content and no contact information or business details visible.
  5. Uses Joomla CMS with MooTools JavaScript library.
  6. No external links except hosting nameserver domain.
  7. No social media or contact emails/phone numbers found.
  8. No security headers or SSL configuration details provided.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain age of about 10 years, registered with REG-THINLINE registrar.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with MooTools JavaScript library, indicating an older technology stack. The HTML structure is basic and includes standard Joomla system CSS and JavaScript files. No modern frameworks or analytics tools are detected. The site is hosted on cesky-hosting.eu, a Czech hosting provider. Performance and mobile optimization appear basic, with no advanced SEO or accessibility features evident. The site is currently offline or in maintenance mode, limiting content availability. Technical debt is present due to outdated technologies and lack of modern security practices. Modernization opportunities include upgrading the CMS, improving security headers, and enhancing user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dcpr.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dcpr.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.