Skip to main content

Security report for daxner.at

DAXNER GmbH · Manufacturing · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DAXNER GmbH is a medium-sized Austrian manufacturing company specializing in bulk material technology and engineering solutions for various industrial sectors including food, chemical, and non-food industries. The company has a strong market position as an internationally leading provider with a comprehensive portfolio of products and services such as engineering, production, assembly, and control technology. Their website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence with excellent content quality and SEO optimization. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and scripts, but lacks a valid SSL certificate and proper HTTPS configuration, which is a significant security concern. Security headers are well implemented, but the absence of TLS protocols and session resumption reduces the overall security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Contact information and social media presence enhance business credibility. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but requires urgent improvements in SSL/TLS security to protect user data and improve trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching daxner.at

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DAXNER GmbH operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on bulk material handling and processing technologies. Their business model is B2B, targeting industrial clients in food processing, chemical, and related industries. The company leverages a strong brand with consistent messaging and trust indicators such as certifications and memberships. Their digital ecosystem includes multilingual support and active social media channels, indicating a mature marketing approach. The company appears to have stable growth and a solid reputation in their niche. Their product and service offerings are diverse, covering engineering, production, and after-sales services, which supports recurring revenue streams and customer retention. The website content and structure suggest a focus on quality and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with several positive practices such as the use of security headers (XSS protection, CSP, HSTS) and a cookie consent mechanism. However, the lack of a valid SSL certificate and absence of HTTPS significantly undermine the security posture, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No vulnerable libraries or known exploits are detected in the scripts used. The site uses reCAPTCHA for form protection, enhancing defense against automated abuse. There is no evidence of an incident response policy or security framework disclosures. Overall, while some best practices are in place, critical gaps in SSL/TLS implementation must be addressed to meet modern security standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  4. Enable DNSSEC and CAA records to strengthen domain security and prevent certificate mis-issuance.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and content security policies to mitigate emerging threats.
  6. Publish an incident response policy and provide security contact information to improve transparency.
  7. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.
  8. Enhance website accessibility and mobile optimization to improve user experience.
  9. Monitor third-party scripts and analytics tools for privacy compliance and minimize tracking where possible.
  10. Consider adding terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance legal and security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DAXNER GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache server and built on WordPress 6.8.1, utilizing a range of modern JavaScript libraries and plugins including jQuery, Slick slider, Fancybox, and Borlabs Cookie for cookie management. SEO is enhanced by Rank Math PRO plugin with structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph metadata properly implemented. Performance optimizations include WP Rocket caching and lazy loading of scripts and images. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols are critical technical deficiencies. DNS records are standard with no DNSSEC or CAA records configured. The site uses Google Maps API and integrates social media platforms for broader engagement. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security upgrades to SSL/TLS configuration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with daxner.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review daxner.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.