Skip to main content

Security report for daxanema.com

Daxa Nema · E-commerce · N/a

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Daxa Nema is a small technology company specializing in cloud-hosted eCommerce solutions, primarily developing Shopify apps under a SaaS model. The company has established a credible market presence since 2016 as a Shopify Partner with over 2,000 active users and a strong app rating. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, leveraging common plugins for analytics and cookie consent. The site demonstrates moderate performance and basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit security policies. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements, but lacks visible direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching daxanema.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
80
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets online merchants seeking hassle-free eCommerce solutions without the burden of IT infrastructure management. Its SaaS business model allows merchants to subscribe and configure apps easily, focusing on Shopify's ecosystem. The partnership with Shopify since 2016 and positive user metrics indicate a stable market position. The website content is consistent and professional, supporting the company's credibility. However, the absence of detailed business registration data and direct contact information may limit transparency. The company appears focused on growth within the eCommerce technology sector, leveraging cloud solutions and customer service as key differentiators.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent banner with granular controls, reflecting good privacy compliance. Google Analytics is integrated with opt-out functionality. However, no advanced security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected, and there is no public security policy or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is justified for this business type. Overall, the security posture is solid for a small SaaS provider but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP security headers and publishing a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Daxa Nema
Description
Daxa Nema offers innovative Cloud-hosted eCommerce solutions with a SaaS approach, focusing on Shopify apps that require no downloads or maintenance, allowing merchants to subscribe and configure easily.
Key services
Cloud-hosted eCommerce solutions, Shopify apps development, Customer service and app maintenance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Google Analytics (gtag.js), MonsterInsights plugin, Cookie Law Info plugin
Frameworks
Divi WordPress Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced with forceSSL in Google Analytics config
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and standard plugins
  2. Cookie consent implemented with detailed categories
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage; contact form available
  4. No terms of service page found
  5. Google Analytics used with opt-out mechanism
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature CMS platform (WordPress) with the Divi theme, which provides a flexible and visually appealing design. The use of jQuery and Google Analytics is standard, with MonsterInsights facilitating analytics integration. Cookie consent is managed by a dedicated plugin, ensuring GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML structure. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, SEO and accessibility could be improved with more semantic markup and ARIA attributes. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available, which could be relevant for performance and security assessments.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with daxanema.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review daxanema.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.