Skip to main content

Security report for davisdsi.com

Davis Strategic Innovations, Inc. · Government · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Davis Strategic Innovations, Inc. (DSI) is a small, Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned small business specializing in providing strategic-level technical and educational services primarily to U.S. government departments in aerospace, defense, medical, environmental, and homeland security sectors. The company leverages its SDVOSB status to secure government contracts and focuses on delivering expertise in engineering, IT, homeland security, and related fields. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear business focus and relevant content for its target audience. Technically, the site is built on a modern WordPress CMS with popular frameworks like Elementor and Gantry5, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, and uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and security headers are not detected, indicating room for improvement in security hardening. Privacy compliance is weak, with no privacy or cookie policies found, which could pose regulatory risks. Overall, the site is credible and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching davisdsi.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DSI operates in a niche government contracting market, focusing on aerospace and defense sectors with a strong emphasis on veteran-owned business status. The business model centers on providing specialized technical and management solutions to U.S. government agencies, supported by direct award eligibility due to SDVOSB certification. The company demonstrates a stable market position with a domain age of over 15 years and multiple trust indicators such as awards and certifications. The website content and structure support its business goals, targeting government clients and partners. There is no evidence of extensive marketing or analytics tools, indicating a focus on direct government contracting rather than broad consumer marketing.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and domain registration protections, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also suggests gaps in compliance with data protection regulations. No forms or user input fields were detected on the homepage, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR and other privacy regulation compliance.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting and improve transparency.
  5. Consider adding contact email addresses for general and security-related inquiries to improve communication and incident response readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Davis Strategic Innovations, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Davis Strategic Innovations, Inc.
Description
DSI is a performance-driven organization with the vision to become a leading systems, technology, and management solutions provider in Aerospace, Defense, Medical, Environmental, and Homeland Security. It is a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned small business dedicated to IT, quality engineering, analysis, research, education, medical and environmental services focused on technical, policy, and procedural issues to enhance national security.
Key services
Engineering, Information Technology, Homeland Security, Weapons of Mass Destruction Issues, Medicine, Environmental Issues, Combatant Command Support, Exercises/Wargame Design and Execution, Training and Education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Elementor 3.29.2, Gantry5 Framework, jQuery 3.7.1, Owl Carousel, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Gantry5, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
All in One SEO (AIOSEO), Elementor
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional government contractor site with clear business focus
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  3. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure present
  4. Uses modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins and frameworks
  5. No contact email explicitly found in HTML content
  6. Phone number and physical address clearly displayed
  7. No social media links detected in the provided content
  8. No forms detected on the homepage content
  9. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data
  10. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 using Elementor and Gantry5 frameworks, which are modern and widely supported technologies. The site uses jQuery and Owl Carousel for interactive elements and Font Awesome for icons. Hosting is behind Cloudflare DNS, providing some level of protection and performance benefits. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security configuration. There are no visible forms on the homepage, limiting data collection but also reducing risk exposure. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with davisdsi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review davisdsi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.