Skip to main content

Security report for datapoint.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website datapoint.co.uk is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare Web Application Firewall (WAF) security challenge page that requires human verification via Turnstile CAPTCHA. This prevents access to any substantive content, business information, or policies. The site appears to be protected by Cloudflare's security infrastructure, indicating an intent to mitigate automated threats or abuse. However, this also limits the ability to analyze the site's actual business offerings, technical maturity, or security posture beyond the WAF layer. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are visible, nor are there any contact details or social media links. The technical infrastructure relies on Cloudflare services, but no CMS or additional frameworks are detectable from the challenge page. The security posture is partially positive due to the use of Cloudflare's protection, but the lack of visible security headers and policies reduces confidence. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, privacy compliance, and business credibility due to the blocked content and lack of accessible information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching datapoint.co.uk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention datapoint.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for datapoint.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the Cloudflare challenge page, no direct business intelligence can be extracted from the website content. There is no visible company name, description, or service information. The domain uses privacy-protected WHOIS registration, which is common for small or medium businesses but limits transparency. No partnerships, subsidiaries, or market positioning data are available. The lack of contact information and policies suggests the site may be in a staging or protected state, or it may have limited public-facing content. Without access to the actual site content, no insights into revenue streams, customer segments, or growth indicators can be determined.

Security posture

The website employs Cloudflare's WAF and Turnstile CAPTCHA, which are strong indicators of a proactive security posture against automated attacks and bots. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are visible due to the content being blocked. There is no evidence of incident response contacts or security policies. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is standard but reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but cannot be fully assessed due to the WAF blocking access.

Recommendations

  1. Provide publicly accessible privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident response.
  3. Implement and expose security headers to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is strong and visible to users.
  5. Reduce reliance on WAF blocking for legitimate users by tuning challenge settings and providing alternative verification methods.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Page is a Cloudflare security challenge page with Turnstile CAPTCHA verifying human visitor before access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare Turnstile, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Cloudflare WAF and Turnstile CAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by Cloudflare WAF security challenge
  2. No visible business or contact information on the landing page
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No forms or data collection fields visible
  5. No social media or external business links except Cloudflare domains
  6. Page title and content indicate a bot verification step, not actual business content
  7. No SEO or accessibility metadata present
  8. No visible security headers or certificates information
  9. Website likely uses Cloudflare for DDoS protection and bot mitigation
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted behind Cloudflare, utilizing their WAF and Turnstile CAPTCHA for bot mitigation. The HTML content is minimal and serves only as a challenge page, lacking any business or marketing content. No CMS or additional frameworks are detectable. The site uses modern HTML5 and CSS3 standards for the challenge page styling. Performance and SEO cannot be assessed due to lack of content. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, limited to the challenge page UI. The technical debt or modernization opportunities cannot be evaluated without access to the full site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with datapoint.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review datapoint.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.