Skip to main content

Security report for datafoundation.org

Data Foundation · Government · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in Security headers.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Data Foundation is a well-established non-profit organization founded in 2005, dedicated to advancing data use in government to improve public policy and services. The organization targets government agencies, policymakers, and data professionals, positioning itself as a leader in data policy advocacy and research. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, providing comprehensive resources and clear contact information. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics and Font Awesome, hosted via GoDaddy with a custom CMS. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain protections, but could benefit from additional headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is strong with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, supporting the organization's mission effectively.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of datafoundation.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching datafoundation.org

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention datafoundation.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for datafoundation.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Data Foundation operates in the government and non-profit sectors, focusing on data policy and open government data initiatives. Their business model centers on advocacy, research, and education, serving a specialized audience of government and data professionals. The organization maintains partnerships with platforms like ToucanTech and Guidestar, enhancing their resource offerings. The domain age and WHOIS data support their legitimacy and long-term presence. While no commercial revenue streams or subsidiaries are evident, their market position as a recognized data policy leader is clear. The website content and structure support their mission and outreach effectively.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and domain registration protections. However, the absence of DNSSEC and certain security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options indicates room for improvement. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could be a gap in transparency. The use of third-party analytics and scripts is standard but requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit but could be enhanced to align with best practices and compliance frameworks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing
  2. Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to reduce XSS risks
  3. Add security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information for transparency
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools for vulnerabilities

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Data Foundation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Data Foundation
Description
Data Foundation is a non-profit organization focused on advancing the use of data in government to improve public policy and services.
Key services
Data policy research, Advocacy for open and effective government data, Educational resources and events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Font Awesome 6 Pro, jQuery, Bootstrap, Custom CMS (likely proprietary or less common)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained
  2. Clear presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  4. Use of modern web fonts and analytics tools
  5. WHOIS privacy protection is used but justified for non-profit
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with modern front-end technologies including Google Fonts, Font Awesome 6 Pro, and Google Analytics. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy, with domain registration dating back to 2005. Performance is moderate with multiple CSS and JS assets loaded, but mobile optimization is good. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data is minimal or not detected. Accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with datafoundation.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review datafoundation.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.