Skip to main content

Security report for dartfordreboreandengines.co.uk

Other · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, DNS health and 2 other checks.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website hosted at ww19.dartfordreboreandengines.co.uk is operating on an invalid domain as per the Nominet UK WHOIS registry, which explicitly states the domain cannot be registered due to naming rules violations. The site content is minimal and primarily consists of an embedded iframe loading content from a third-party domain, which raises concerns about the legitimacy and intent of the site. There is no visible business information, contact details, or privacy policies, although consent management scripts are present indicating some attempt at GDPR compliance. The lack of HTTPS and security headers further weakens the security posture of the site. Technically, the site uses JavaScript and a ConsentManager CMP for cookie consent, but lacks modern web standards such as SSL/TLS encryption and security headers. The embedded iframe content is suspicious and may pose security risks. The site performance and user experience are poor due to minimal content and unclear navigation. From a security perspective, the invalid domain registration, absence of HTTPS, and suspicious external content are critical vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policies are visible, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. Overall, the site presents a high risk for users and lacks trustworthiness. Strategically, it is recommended to migrate to a valid domain with proper registration, implement HTTPS, remove suspicious third-party content, and provide clear business and privacy information to improve legitimacy and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      Domain Expired

      Domain expired 23 days ago

      What to do: Renew domain registration immediately

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dartfordreboreandengines.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
10
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
37

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired · found on this site
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of business information, no clear market positioning or business model can be determined. The domain name suggests a connection to an engine rebore and repair business in Dartford, UK, but no supporting content or contact details confirm this. The site appears to be a placeholder or redirect with embedded third-party content rather than a fully operational business website. There are no indications of partnerships, certifications, or growth indicators. The absence of professional content and contact information suggests a low level of business maturity and credibility.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. The absence of HTTPS means data transmitted to and from the site is not encrypted, exposing users to interception risks. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, increasing vulnerability to clickjacking and other attacks. The embedded iframe from an unknown third-party domain could be a vector for malicious content or tracking. No incident response or security contact information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security certifications are visible. The presence of a ConsentManager CMP indicates some awareness of privacy compliance but is insufficient to mitigate the overall security risks.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and use a valid registered domain compliant with registry rules.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.
  3. Remove or replace suspicious third-party iframe content with legitimate site content.
  4. Add clear and accessible privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service pages.
  5. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  6. Provide verifiable business contact information including emails and phone numbers.
  7. Establish an incident response contact channel for security issues.
  8. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  9. Improve website content quality and navigation for better user experience.
  10. Ensure compliance with GDPR and other relevant privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, ConsentManager CMP
Performance
slow
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100
Good practices seen
  • Consent Management Platform for GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
ConsentManager
Tracking pixels
ConsentManager tracking pixel
Marketing tools
ConsentManager CMP
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website uses an invalid domain per WHOIS registry
  2. Content is minimal and mostly an embedded iframe from a third-party domain
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service found
  4. Consent management scripts are present indicating some GDPR compliance effort
  5. No contact information or business details available
  6. No security headers or HTTPS detected
  7. Website appears to be a redirect or placeholder with suspicious external content
  8. No clear branding or company identity visible
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic JavaScript and integrates a ConsentManager CMP for cookie consent management. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern web frameworks. The site is served over HTTP without SSL/TLS encryption, which is a significant security risk. The content is primarily an embedded iframe from a third-party domain, which is suspicious and may indicate the site is a redirect or parked domain rather than a functional business website. Performance is likely slow due to reliance on external resources and lack of optimization. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with minimal content and no clear navigation structure. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags, titles, and structured data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dartfordreboreandengines.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dartfordreboreandengines.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.