Skip to main content

Security report for darbnica.shop

E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website darbnica.shop currently serves as a placeholder page hosted on the Shopify platform indicating that the store is unavailable. The page content is minimal and primarily directs visitors to Shopify's main site and other stores. The business appears to be an ecommerce store powered by Shopify, but no active content or company-specific information is present. Technically, the site uses Shopify's infrastructure and includes jQuery 2.0.3 from Shopify's CDN. There is no evidence of custom frameworks or additional technologies. Security posture is minimal with no visible security headers or privacy policies, and no contact or compliance information is provided. Overall, the site is accessible but lacks substantive content, business credibility signals, and privacy compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching darbnica.shop

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
75
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The domain appears to be intended for an ecommerce business using Shopify's platform. However, the store is currently inactive or expired, as indicated by the placeholder content. There are no visible business details such as company name, contact information, or legal disclosures. The target audience would be ecommerce customers or entrepreneurs, but no active marketing or sales content is present. The business model is typical of Shopify stores, relying on online sales through the platform. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The lack of active content and contact details suggests the business is either new, inactive, or abandoned.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the absence of security headers, privacy policies, and incident response information. The site uses HTTPS as implied by Shopify hosting but no explicit SSL configuration details are provided. No forms or user input fields are present, reducing attack surface but also indicating no active customer engagement. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the lack of security best practices and compliance documentation is a concern for trustworthiness. Incident response readiness and data protection officer information are missing, indicating low maturity in security governance.

Recommendations

  1. Add and prominently display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company email and phone number to enhance business credibility.
  4. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is properly enforced and visible to users.
  5. Develop and publish a security incident response policy and designate a data protection officer if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Shopify provides a reliable Ecommerce platform so you focus on selling online! Integrated hosting, shopping cart and Ecommerce payment solution all in one!
Key services
Ecommerce platform, Integrated hosting, Shopping cart, Payment solutions
Content quality
poor
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.0.3
Platforms
Shopify
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Shopify platform, leveraging its hosting and CDN services. The only external script detected is jQuery 2.0.3, which is an older version but still functional. The HTML structure is valid but minimal, reflecting a placeholder page rather than a fully developed ecommerce site. Performance is likely moderate due to Shopify's infrastructure, but no explicit performance metrics are available. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features detected. SEO optimization is minimal, with only basic meta tags present. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack and improve user experience by adding richer content and interactive elements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with darbnica.shop. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review darbnica.shop.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.