Skip to main content

Security report for danubegeotour.eu

Other · N/a

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website danubegeotour.eu is a geo-tourism platform providing information about geoparks, points of interest, trails, and geo-products in the Danube region. It targets tourists, families, groups, schools, and experts interested in geo-tourism activities. The platform allows users to explore geo-related content and submit ideas for new geo-products, positioning itself as a niche informational resource in the geo-tourism sector. Technically, the website leverages Google Maps API for interactive mapping, uses modern fonts and icons, and appears to be built with a SPA framework such as Vue.js. Hosting is provided by WebSupport s.r.o. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes a CSRF token, but lacks visible security headers and published privacy or cookie policies. There is no contact information for incident response or data protection officers, which limits transparency and compliance. No analytics or tracking beyond Google Maps is detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the website is functional and serves its informational purpose but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and contact transparency to enhance trust and security posture. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, adding security headers, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching danubegeotour.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Danubegeotour.eu operates in the geo-tourism niche, focusing on the Danube region's geoparks and related activities. Its business model centers on providing informational content and community engagement through idea submissions for geo-products. The platform targets a diverse audience including tourists, families, schools, and experts, aiming to foster geo-tourism awareness and participation. The site is small in scale with no evident parent or subsidiary companies. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized geo-tourism content and interactive mapping features. Revenue streams are not explicit but may include partnerships or promotional activities. The partnership ecosystem is not detailed, and the site shows moderate branding consistency with basic content quality.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and CSRF protection. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are essential for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The absence of published privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report or handle security issues effectively. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in policy transparency and technical safeguards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including dedicated email addresses for abuse or security reporting.
  4. Conduct a security audit of all forms and inputs to ensure proper validation and protection against injection attacks.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility features to enhance user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website appears to be a geo-tourism platform focused on the Danube region, offering information about geoparks, points of interest, trails, geo-products, and ideas for new geo-products. It targets users interested in geo-tourism activities and related services.
Key services
Geoparks information, Points of interest, Trails, GeoProducts, Idea submission for new GeoProducts
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Maps API, Roboto font, Material Icons, FilePond (file upload library), JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Uses HTTPS (implied by Google Maps API usage with key)
  • CSRF token present in meta tag

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a geo-tourism informational platform focused on Danube geoparks.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links detected.
  4. Uses Google Maps API extensively for map display.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Google Maps.
  7. Basic design and navigation with moderate branding consistency.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Maps API for interactive mapping, Material Icons, and Roboto fonts for UI consistency. The presence of a CSRF token indicates some security awareness. The site appears to be a single-page application, likely built with Vue.js or a similar framework, and uses Bootstrap classes for layout. Hosting is provided by WebSupport s.r.o., a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in mobile responsiveness and SEO. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based build. The site lacks advanced analytics or marketing tools, indicating a focus on content delivery rather than commercial tracking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with danubegeotour.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review danubegeotour.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.