Skip to main content

Security report for danrenbogdol.dk

DANREN BOGDOL A/S · Other · Denmark

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Danren Bogdol A/S is a professional cleaning company based in Denmark, with over 40 years of experience in providing commercial and private cleaning services. The company operates from multiple locations including Odense, Århus, and Glostrup, serving a nationwide customer base. Their service portfolio includes commercial cleaning, window cleaning, facility services such as stairwell cleaning, facade cleaning, graffiti removal, ventilation cleaning, and specialized cleaning for various sectors including offices, clinics, restaurants, and institutions. The company emphasizes quality, professionalism, and customer satisfaction, supported by the Servicenormen certification and positive customer testimonials. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, incorporating modern web technologies such as jQuery, Font Awesome, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with cookie regulations. The site is mobile optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices with structured data and meta tags. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration but lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as CSP or HSTS. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or security challenge, and no critical vulnerabilities were detected in the analysis. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional business presence with room for improvement in privacy policy publication, security header implementation, and explicit security governance disclosures. These enhancements would strengthen trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching danrenbogdol.dk

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention danrenbogdol.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for danrenbogdol.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Danren Bogdol A/S holds a solid market position as a medium-sized cleaning service provider in Denmark, leveraging over four decades of industry experience. Their competitive advantage lies in their comprehensive service offerings, certified quality standards, and strong customer relationships evidenced by testimonials. The business model focuses on B2B and B2C cleaning services with a flexible, customer-centric approach. Revenue streams likely derive from recurring contracts in commercial, public, and private sectors. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with service standard organizations and uses digital marketing and analytics tools to support growth. Strategic observations include the need to enhance digital trust signals and compliance documentation to support further market expansion and customer confidence.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is moderate. The use of HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies indicates gaps in defense-in-depth and transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, and forms appear to be standard without visible security flaws. The lack of incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits the organization's readiness to handle security incidents and external reports. Compliance with GDPR is partially supported by cookie consent but lacks a formal privacy policy. The security culture is not explicitly communicated on the site. Business impact of these gaps includes potential reputational risk and regulatory scrutiny. Enhancing security governance and technical controls is recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to secure domain name resolution and prevent DNS spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues, including a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DANREN BOGDOL A/S
Description
Professionelt rengøringsfirma i Odense med 40 års erfaring. Vi kører ud fra Odense, Århus og Glostrup og dækker hele landet. Kontakt os i dag
Key services
Erhvervsrengøring (Commercial cleaning), Vinduespolering (Window cleaning), Specialized cleaning for offices, industries, clinics, canteens, restaurants, shops, institutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Elementor
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Leadinfo
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, Leadinfo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional cleaning service company site targeting Danish market
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot
  4. Multiple service offerings clearly structured in navigation
  5. Contact phone number prominently displayed with call-to-action
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. Use of modern WordPress and Elementor technology stack
  9. Good SEO and structured data usage
  10. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. The tech stack includes jQuery and Font Awesome for UI enhancements, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing integration. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with some optimization opportunities. Mobile responsiveness is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface. No hosting provider details were identified from the data. Overall, the infrastructure supports business needs but could benefit from enhanced security and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with danrenbogdol.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review danrenbogdol.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.