Skip to main content

Security report for danone.no

Danone · Other · Norway

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Danone.no is the Norwegian localized website for Danone, a large multinational food and beverage corporation. The site serves as a corporate and product information portal targeting Norwegian consumers. The website is built on WordPress and incorporates modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager for analytics, Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. Performance monitoring is implemented via New Relic Browser scripts. However, the site lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, as well as visible contact information, which are important for compliance and user trust. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and bot protection, but additional security headers and policies could enhance the security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching danone.no

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Danone operates in the food and beverage sector with a strong global presence. The Norwegian site likely supports regional marketing and corporate communications. The business model focuses on manufacturing and retailing food products. The website's content and branding are consistent with Danone's corporate identity. The absence of detailed contact and compliance information suggests the site may be primarily informational rather than transactional. The use of OneTrust indicates awareness of privacy compliance requirements. No suspicious or fraudulent indicators were found in the domain registration or website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files limits transparency. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which could improve protection against common web attacks. The New Relic monitoring indicates active performance and error tracking. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incidents.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish a security.txt file to enhance trust and security transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danone
Description
Danone is a multinational food-products corporation. The website appears to be the Norwegian localized site for Danone, focusing on their products and corporate presence in Norway.
Key services
Food and beverage products, Corporate information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, OneTrust Cookie Consent, New Relic Browser Agent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent via OneTrust

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
OneTrust
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found on the homepage or linked in metadata.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust with a visible banner and scripts.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses were found in the HTML content.
  5. Site uses WordPress CMS with custom Danone theme and fonts.
  6. Google Tag Manager and Google reCAPTCHA are used for analytics and bot protection.
  7. New Relic Browser monitoring scripts are present indicating performance and error monitoring.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  10. No social media links detected in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a custom Danone theme and local fonts. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. OneTrust manages cookie consent, indicating GDPR awareness. New Relic Browser scripts are used for performance and error monitoring. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets from both internal and external sources. The domain is relatively new but consistent with a regional site for a multinational. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility and SEO are basic but functional. No major technical issues or vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with danone.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review danone.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.