Skip to main content

Security report for danone.lt

Danone · Other · Lithuania

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Danone.lt is the Lithuanian regional website of Danone, a global leader in the food and beverage industry specializing in dairy, plant-based products, water, and specialized nutrition. The site serves as a corporate and consumer information portal tailored to the Lithuanian market. The website is built on WordPress and incorporates modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, and OneTrust for cookie consent, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Performance and mobile optimization are adequate, though accessibility features could be enhanced. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and use of anti-bot mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is strong, with GDPR-aligned cookie consent and a comprehensive privacy policy. Overall, the site projects a professional and trustworthy image consistent with a large multinational enterprise.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching danone.lt

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Danone operates as a multinational corporation with a B2C business model, targeting general consumers in Lithuania. The website supports brand presence and product information dissemination. The domain age and registration details align with the company's established market presence. The absence of direct contact information on the homepage suggests a focus on corporate branding rather than direct customer support via the site. The use of OneTrust and Google analytics tools indicates adherence to privacy regulations and data-driven marketing strategies. No affiliate or partner domains were identified, indicating a direct corporate web presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an area for improvement. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened by implementing recommended headers and publishing security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Add a terms of service page to complete legal documentation.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Danone
Description
Danone is a multinational food-products corporation, focusing on dairy, plant-based products, water, and specialized nutrition. The website is the Lithuanian regional site for Danone, providing corporate information and product details.
Key services
Dairy products, Plant-based products, Water, Specialized nutrition
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, OneTrust Cookie Consent, New Relic Browser Agent
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser Agent
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
New Relic
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with custom theme
  2. Implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent via OneTrust
  3. Includes Google Tag Manager and New Relic for analytics and performance monitoring
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage
  5. No terms of service page found
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  7. Website is fully accessible without WAF or security challenge
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress CMS with a custom theme and uses modern JavaScript libraries and services such as Google Tag Manager and New Relic for analytics and performance monitoring. The site loads asynchronously scripts for performance and includes a cookie consent mechanism via OneTrust. Hosting details are limited but domain registration is managed by a reputable registrar. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO optimization is present but could be improved with richer metadata and structured data. No critical technical debt or risks were identified.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with danone.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review danone.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.