Skip to main content

Security report for danielseiner.cz

Daniel Šeiner · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Daniel Šeiner's website serves as a professional portfolio showcasing wedding and fashion photography services. The site targets a general audience interested in high-quality photographic services, positioning itself as a local small business in the Czech Republic. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on personalized photography offerings without evident e-commerce or subscription components. Technically, the website is built on an older WordPress platform with Visual Composer and uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Font Awesome. While the site is mobile responsive and visually consistent, it lacks modern security headers and up-to-date CMS versions, which could expose it to vulnerabilities. Security posture is moderate due to HTTPS usage but is weakened by missing security best practices and absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and does not contain any adult or explicit content. However, the lack of WHOIS data and contact information reduces trust and business credibility. Strategic improvements in security, compliance, and transparency are recommended to enhance the site's professionalism and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching danielseiner.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents a small-scale photography business specializing in weddings and fashion, targeting clients primarily in the Czech Republic. The business leverages a portfolio website to attract potential customers, with no visible e-commerce or direct sales functionality. The absence of contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage may limit direct client engagement. The site does not show partnerships or affiliations with other domains or services. The business appears to rely on organic reach and portfolio presentation rather than aggressive marketing or tracking. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the site content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies may impact compliance with GDPR, especially given the European location. The business could benefit from clearer contact channels and compliance documentation to improve client confidence and legal standing.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are critical for mitigating common web attacks. The WordPress version detected is outdated (3.8.41), potentially exposing the site to known vulnerabilities if not patched. No forms or input fields were detected on the homepage, reducing immediate attack surface but also limiting user interaction. No privacy or cookie policies were found, indicating potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in CMS updates, security headers, and compliance documentation to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress and all plugins/themes to the latest versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information such as company email and phone number to enhance business credibility.
  5. Investigate and resolve the lack of WHOIS data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Daniel Šeiner
Description
Fotograf Daniel Šeiner - profesionální svatební a módní fotografie
Key services
wedding photography, fashion photography
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 3.8.41, jQuery 1.10.2, jQuery Migrate 1.2.1, Visual Composer, Font Awesome, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress, Visual Composer
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional photography portfolio for Daniel Šeiner.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the HTML content.
  5. Website uses outdated WordPress version (3.8.41) which may pose security risks.
  6. HTTPS is enabled but no advanced security headers detected.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  9. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Mobile optimization appears good based on responsive CSS inclusion.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 3.8.41 with Visual Composer as the page builder, using jQuery 1.10.2 and Font Awesome for icons. The site loads multiple CSS stylesheets including responsive styles and uses Typekit fonts for typography. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for description and canonical URLs. The site is mobile responsive and uses a slider for visual presentation. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Performance is moderate with some potential for optimization given the use of older libraries and multiple CSS files. Accessibility features are basic, with no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility tags detected. SEO optimization is basic with meta description and canonical tags but lacks structured data or Open Graph tags. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, with opportunities for modernization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with danielseiner.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review danielseiner.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.