Skip to main content

Security report for danielcodrescu.ro

Other · Romania

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website danielcodrescu.ro is currently inaccessible, returning a 421 Misdirected Request error indicating a server misconfiguration or blocking issue. Due to this, no meaningful content, metadata, or business information is available for analysis. The domain is registered since 2016 with a Romanian registrar, which aligns with the domain's country code and suggests a legitimate registration. However, the lack of accessible content and security configurations severely limits the ability to assess the business or technical maturity of the site. The absence of privacy policies, contact information, and security headers further indicates that the website is either under maintenance, misconfigured, or abandoned. From a technical perspective, the hosting provider is identified as Host-Age.ro Gazduire Web SRL, but no CMS, frameworks, or technologies can be detected due to the lack of content. Security posture cannot be properly evaluated without HTTPS or security headers information. The site does not present any signs of adult or explicit content, and the content safety rating is safe but based solely on minimal content. Overall, the website poses a high risk due to inaccessibility and lack of transparency. Strategic recommendations include resolving the server misconfiguration to restore access, implementing HTTPS with proper SSL certificates, adding privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR, and publishing clear contact and business information to improve trust and credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching danielcodrescu.ro

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
15
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible content, no detailed business intelligence can be derived. The domain age and registrar suggest a small-scale or personal website based in Romania. No information about market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The lack of visible services or business descriptions limits any competitive or strategic analysis.

Security posture

The current security posture is poor due to the lack of accessible content and absence of security headers or HTTPS confirmation. The 421 error indicates a server misconfiguration that could expose the site to availability issues. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The domain does not use DNSSEC, which could improve domain security. Overall, the site lacks basic security best practices and compliance indicators.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve the 421 Misdirected Request error to restore website accessibility.
  2. Implement HTTPS with valid SSL/TLS certificates to secure communications.
  3. Add and publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR requirements.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Publish clear contact information and business details to enhance trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website returns a 421 Misdirected Request error indicating misconfiguration or blocking; content is inaccessible. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Analytics and tracking

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to a 421 Misdirected Request error.
  2. No metadata, forms, scripts, or external links detected in the HTML content.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or social media links available.
  5. WHOIS data shows domain registered since 2016 with a Romanian registrar.
  6. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  7. Website appears to be down or misconfigured, preventing proper analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a minimal error page with no detectable technologies, scripts, or metadata. Hosting is provided by Host-Age.ro Gazduire Web SRL. No CMS or frameworks are identifiable. The domain uses name servers ns10.securepod.com and ns11.securepod.com but does not have DNSSEC enabled. Performance, mobile optimization, SEO, and accessibility cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The site requires technical remediation to restore normal operation and enable further analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with danielcodrescu.ro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review danielcodrescu.ro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.