Skip to main content

Security report for dana.lv

SIA Dana · Other · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Dana is a Latvian company established in 1993 specializing in the cutting, processing, manufacturing, and installation of granite memorial products such as headstones, grave borders, and benches. The company holds a strong regional market position in eastern Latvia, offering a wide range of granite products with customization options. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with detailed product listings, multiple physical locations, and contact forms protected by Google reCAPTCHA. Technically, the site uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and Google APIs, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA but lacks some security headers and formal privacy documentation. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, though the absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dana.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention dana.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for dana.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and retail sector focused on granite memorial products. Its business model combines production and direct sales with installation services. The target customers are individuals and families seeking durable and high-quality memorials. The company benefits from a long-standing market presence and technical expertise. The website supports business growth by showcasing products online and facilitating customer contact. However, the lack of privacy and cookie policies and limited security disclosures may impact compliance and trust in broader markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML, and no vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense in depth. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is not clearly addressed, and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be improved to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response and vulnerability disclosure process, including a security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to provide transparent user control over tracking and data collection.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Dana
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Dana
Description
Uzņēmums SIA Dana ir dibināts 1993. gadā, un specializējas granīta griešanā, apstrādē un pieminekļu ražošanā. Tāpat veicam pieminekļu pārdošanu un uzstādīšanu. Uzsākot savu darbību bijām vieni no pirmajiem šajā tirgū Latvijas austrumos. Kopš darbības uzsākšanas laika esam guvuši lielu pieredzi, kā arī izveidojuši nepieciešamo tehnisko bāzi augstas kvalitātes granīta pieminekļu ražošanai.
Key services
Granite cutting and processing, Manufacture of granite memorials, Sales and installation of memorials, Customization and design services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Google Fonts, Google Maps API, Google reCAPTCHA v2 Invisible, Font Awesome, Fancybox, Revolution Slider, SmartMenus, Isotope, Lightbox, FlexSlider, TimeCircles, NoUISlider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by https URL and Google reCAPTCHA usage)
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 Invisible on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Contact forms with CSRF protection implied by form structure

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Elfsight widgets
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and product listings.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found.
  4. Contact information is comprehensive and includes multiple physical locations in Latvia.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google services.
  6. Security best practices partially implemented (HTTPS, reCAPTCHA) but missing security headers.
  7. No evidence of suspicious or malicious content.
  8. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a well-established technology stack with jQuery, Bootstrap, and various UI and animation libraries. Google Fonts and Maps APIs are integrated for enhanced user experience. The site is mobile-optimized and includes interactive elements such as sliders and modals. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and deferred analytics. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from improved accessibility features and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dana.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dana.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.