Skip to main content

Security report for dais.lv

DAIS · Other · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DAIS is a Latvian data processing information system currently in the development phase. The website provides links to various service-related pages but lacks substantive business content, contact information, and security or privacy policies. The site uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and tracking tools like Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, indicating basic digital infrastructure but limited technical maturity. Security posture is weak due to absence of HTTPS and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, which raises compliance concerns. Overall, the website appears to be a small-scale project or early-stage business with minimal online presence and low trust indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dais.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to target a general Latvian audience with services spanning retail, construction, food production, and transport sectors. The lack of detailed company information, contact details, or certifications limits assessment of market positioning or competitive advantages. The business model seems to be informational or service-oriented, possibly aggregating or managing data for various sectors. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible due to minimal content.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS is a critical vulnerability, exposing users to data interception risks. No security headers or policies are implemented, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The use of third-party analytics without visible privacy compliance mechanisms further weakens the security and privacy posture. The site lacks contact information for security incidents or data protection officers, indicating poor readiness for compliance with GDPR or other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS across the entire website to secure user data and improve trust.
  2. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security inquiries.
  4. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and publish relevant contact channels for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DAIS
Description
DAIS is a data processing information system. The website is currently in development stage and contains links to various service pages such as shops, builders, meat, ice cream, factory, budget, transport, bread, and contact.
Key services
veikals (shop), celtnieki (builders), galja (meat), zagis, saldejums (ice cream), rupnica (factory), komplekss, budzets (budget), transports (transport), maize (bread)
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Slimbox2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is in development stage with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses provided.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement detected from available data.
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No forms or data collection fields detected on homepage.
  7. No social media links or external business-related domains found except analytics providers.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  9. Content is in Latvian language and related to various business sectors.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy technologies such as jQuery and Slimbox2, indicating a dated tech stack. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are integrated for tracking, but no modern frameworks or CMS are detected. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features beyond basic levels. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern practices. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents significant technical debt and risk. The site structure is simple with static HTML and no dynamic forms or user input fields detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dais.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dais.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.