Skip to main content

Security report for daggra.lv

SIA DagGra · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA DagGra is a Latvian accounting and tax consulting firm established in 2006, providing professional accounting services and tax consultations primarily to local businesses. The company emphasizes quality, responsibility, and personal approach, offering various service packages and 24-hour professional tax advice. The website reflects a well-established small business with consistent branding and clear contact information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using common plugins such as WPBakery and Slider Revolution, with Google Analytics and Google reCAPTCHA integrated for analytics and security. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers are missing and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with basic privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching daggra.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DagGra operates in the accounting and tax consulting sector targeting Latvian SMEs and entrepreneurs. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing market presence since 2006, personalized service, and comprehensive service packages. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on outsourcing accounting functions and providing tax advice. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and certification from LRGA_IFAC, enhancing trust. The website content and structure support lead generation and client engagement. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The firm appears to maintain a stable local market position with potential for growth through digital channels.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No security or incident response policies are published, which may impact compliance and client trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the source code. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but further improvements in transparency and documented security practices are recommended. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, representing areas for enhancement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve site security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency and compliance.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security posture.
  4. Verify and publish WHOIS domain registration details to strengthen trust and legitimacy.
  5. Continue maintaining GDPR compliance and consider enhancing privacy notices and data retention disclosures.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA DagGra
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA DagGra
Description
Grāmatvedības birojs SIA DagGra sniedz profesionālus grāmatvedības pakalpojumus un nodokļu konsultācijas kopš 2006. gada. Uzņēmums piedāvā ārpakalpojumus, dažādus grāmatvedības pakalpojumu līmeņus un nodokļu konsultācijas, uzsverot kvalitāti, atbildību un personisku attieksmi.
Key services
Ārpakalpojumi, Grāmatvedības pakalpojumi (DagGra MINIMUM, OPTIMUM, MAXIMUM), Nodokļu konsultācijas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Slider Revolution, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • Cookie consent banner present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local businesses.
  3. Clear contact information including phone and physical address provided.
  4. Cookie consent banner present and GDPR privacy policy linked.
  5. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Analytics.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities observed in source.
  10. Professional branding and consistent design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution plugins, indicating a common and maintainable technology stack. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile responsive. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses modern fonts and CSS styling consistent with professional design. No critical technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with daggra.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review daggra.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.