Skip to main content

Security report for dafabetaffiliates.com

Dafabet Affiliates · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dafabet Affiliates operates a professional affiliate marketing platform promoting a portfolio of online betting brands including sports betting, casino, live dealer, virtual games, lottery, and arcade offerings. The website targets online bettors and affiliate marketers, providing commission-based revenue share models and marketing tools. The platform is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics integrations, demonstrating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and published policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the active and consistent website presence suggests a legitimate business. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dafabetaffiliates.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as an established affiliate marketing program within the online gambling sector, leveraging multiple betting brands under the Dafabet umbrella. Its revenue model is commission-based, incentivizing affiliates with revenue share rates up to 40%. The target audience includes online bettors and affiliate marketers globally, with multilingual support evident. The company appears medium-sized with operations dating back to at least 2018. The partnership ecosystem includes various advertising and tracking service providers. Strategic observations include the need for improved compliance with privacy regulations and enhanced trust signals such as visible certifications or contact details.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency and readiness perception. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file further reduces security maturity. Tracking and advertising scripts are extensive, increasing the attack surface and privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dafabet Affiliates
Description
Dafabet Affiliates operates an affiliate marketing program promoting Dafabet's online betting brands, offering a variety of online gaming experiences including sports betting, casino, live dealer, virtual games, lottery, and arcade games. The platform targets online bettors with diverse preferences and provides commission-based revenue share models.
Key services
Affiliate marketing, Revenue share commissions, Marketing tools and promotions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Adform, Matomo Analytics, Contact Form 7
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform, Adscool, Recapads
Tracking pixels
Matomo Analytics, Opera Mobile Tracking
Marketing tools
Contact Form 7
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is focused on affiliate marketing for online gambling brands.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact form is primary contact method.
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner or GDPR compliance mechanisms detected.
  5. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trustworthiness score.
  6. Website uses multiple third-party tracking and advertising services.
  7. Site is built on WordPress with common plugins and SEO tools.
  8. Mobile optimization and SEO are good but accessibility could be improved.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, supported by jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and advertising services including Google Analytics, Matomo, Adform, and others. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The technical stack is standard for affiliate marketing sites but would benefit from modernization and security hardening to reduce risks and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dafabetaffiliates.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dafabetaffiliates.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.