Skip to main content

Security report for daers.lv

SIA Daers · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Daers is a Latvian-based company specializing in the production and distribution of frozen food products such as pelmeni, meat products, vareniki, and pancakes. Established in 1995, the company has grown into a medium-sized manufacturer with a diverse product range and a presence in multiple European markets including Latvia, Estonia, the UK, Spain, Germany, and Ireland. The website reflects a business-focused approach with multilingual support and detailed contact information, targeting both consumers and business partners. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries and common UI sliders, with Google Maps integration to showcase multiple physical locations. However, there is no evidence of modern CMS or advanced frameworks.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MSSQL

      Port 1433 (MSSQL) is publicly accessible - MSSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MSSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching daers.lv

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing and retail sectors, focusing on frozen culinary products. Its market position is that of an established regional player with export capabilities. The business model centers on manufacturing and wholesale distribution, supported by a stable customer base and expanding partner network across Europe. The website content and contact details suggest a transparent and credible business operation, though the lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates room for compliance improvement. No social media or advanced marketing tools are evident, suggesting a traditional business approach.

Security posture

The website lacks visible security headers and uses an outdated version of jQuery, which may expose it to known vulnerabilities. There is no indication of HTTPS enforcement or SSL configuration from the provided data, which is a critical security gap. No forms are present on the homepage, reducing immediate attack surface, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. The overall security posture is moderate to low, with recommendations to upgrade libraries, implement HTTPS, add security headers, and establish privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce secure connections site-wide.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  5. Introduce secure, validated contact forms with CAPTCHA to prevent spam and improve user interaction.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Daers
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Daers
Description
SIA Daers specializes in the production of frozen products including pelmeni, meat, and culinary products such as vareniki and pancakes with various fillings. The company started operations in 1995 and has grown into a stable, dynamically developing enterprise with a product range of over 60 items. Their products are appreciated in Latvia and across Europe.
Key services
Frozen pelmeni production, Frozen culinary products, Wholesale distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, BxSlider, Owl Carousel, Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected on homepage

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage or main content to collect user data.
  5. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries may pose security risks.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  8. Website is multilingual with Latvian, English, and Russian language options.
  9. Google Maps API is used to display multiple company locations in Latvia.
  10. No security headers or HTTPS status information available from provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries including jQuery 1.11.0, BxSlider, and Owl Carousel for UI components, and integrates Google Maps API for location display. No modern CMS or frameworks are detected. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no explicit analytics or tracking scripts found, indicating minimal user tracking. The absence of security headers and unknown SSL status are technical risks. The site structure and navigation are clear and user-friendly, but SEO optimization is basic. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but dated, with opportunities for modernization and security enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with daers.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review daers.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.