Skip to main content

Security report for dadsons.lv

Dadsons · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dadsons is a small business specializing in wooden houses and timber products, targeting a general audience interested in construction and timber solutions. The website is built on WordPress and utilizes common SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO and Google Analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site content is minimal but relevant, with clear branding and consistent messaging focused on their core business offerings. However, the lack of visible contact information, privacy policies, and WHOIS data limits the overall trust and transparency of the site. From a security perspective, the website does not show evidence of advanced security headers or explicit SSL configuration details in the provided data, which suggests room for improvement in security posture. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No forms or data collection mechanisms were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure but also limiting user engagement capabilities. Overall, the website presents a basic but functional online presence for a small manufacturing business. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy assessment. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy compliance, and contact transparency would enhance trustworthiness and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dadsons.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dadsons operates in the manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on wooden houses and timber products, likely serving customers in Latvia and surrounding regions. The business model appears to be product-based manufacturing and sales, targeting construction and timber market segments. The website's use of WordPress and SEO tools suggests an intent to attract organic traffic and potential customers online. There is no evidence of extensive partnerships, subsidiaries, or complex business structures. The company likely operates as a small enterprise with a focused product offering. Growth opportunities could include expanding digital presence, adding e-commerce capabilities, and improving customer engagement through enhanced contact and policy transparency.

Security posture

The current security posture of the website is basic. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is available, limiting the ability to handle security incidents effectively. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces moderate tracking but no visible vulnerabilities. Overall, the site would benefit from implementing standard security best practices, improving privacy compliance, and establishing clear incident response protocols.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify via security headers.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dadsons
Description
Wooden Houses and Timber
Key services
Wooden Houses, Timber
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small business site focused on wooden houses and timber products.
  2. Content is minimal but relevant and consistent with business domain.
  3. No contact information or policies found on the homepage HTML provided.
  4. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Google Analytics integrations.
  6. No security headers or explicit SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; registrant and domain age unknown.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.5 with the Yoast SEO plugin for search engine optimization and Google Analytics for traffic monitoring. The presence of Google Tag Manager indicates some level of marketing and analytics sophistication. The site uses custom CSS and inline styles for basic theming. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading or errors. Mobile optimization is basic but present. Accessibility features are minimal but not absent. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. The site lacks visible forms or interactive elements, limiting data collection and user engagement. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a small business website but could be enhanced with modern security and performance best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dadsons.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dadsons.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.