Skip to main content

Security report for da.dk

Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening · Government · Denmark

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening (DA) is a leading Danish employer organization representing 11 employer associations in the private sector. The website serves as a comprehensive platform for policy analysis, statistics, and employer services targeting Danish private sector employers and member organizations. The organization is well-established with a domain age dating back to 1995, reflecting its longstanding presence in the Danish labor market landscape. The site provides rich content in Danish, including news, analyses, and thematic areas relevant to labor market stakeholders. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Matomo analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, and AngularJS, alongside a robust cookie consent mechanism powered by CookieInformation. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, though it lacks explicit CMS identification and some advanced security headers. HTTPS is enforced, and privacy compliance is strong with detailed cookie policies and consent management. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates good practices such as encrypted connections and form protection but lacks published security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or suspicious indicators were detected. The WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the organization's identity. Overall, DA's website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, serving its audience effectively. Strategic improvements could include enhancing security header implementation, publishing security and incident response policies, and adding explicit terms of service to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching da.dk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention da.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
69
Employees
0
Customers
68
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
13%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for da.dk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DA holds a strong market position as the primary employer organization in Denmark's private sector, offering services including policy advocacy, labor market statistics, and employer education. Its business model is membership-based, serving a large number of companies and employees. The organization leverages partnerships with service providers like CookieInformation for privacy compliance. The website content and structure indicate a focus on transparency, member engagement, and thought leadership in labor market issues. Growth indicators include active publication of analyses and thematic content. The absence of direct contact emails suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms and newsletters.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent is managed comprehensively, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  5. Add explicit terms of service to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening
Description
Dansk Arbejdsgiverforening (DA) er hovedorganisation for 11 arbejdsgiverforeninger på det danske private arbejdsmarked. DA er en medlemsstyret arbejdsgiverorganisation.
Key services
Policy analysis, Statistics, Employer representation, Training and education, Communication and advocacy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Matomo Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Slick Carousel, AngularJS (legacy), CookieInformation Consent SDK
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Danish
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with detailed categories
  3. No explicit terms of service found
  4. Contact information primarily via contact forms and newsletter subscription
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. Use of modern analytics and consent technologies
  7. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of modern and legacy technologies including AngularJS, jQuery, and Slick Carousel. Analytics are handled via Matomo, providing privacy-friendly tracking. The cookie consent mechanism is robust and user-friendly. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags. Hosting details are not explicit, and no CMS is identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. Technical debt may exist due to AngularJS usage, which is an older framework. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack and improve security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with da.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review da.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.