Skip to main content

Security report for d-a-r.hr

Društvo Arhitekata Rijeka · Other · Croatia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

37/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Društvo Arhitekata Rijeka is a Croatian professional association dedicated to architects and architecture-related activities in the Rijeka region. The website serves as a hub for news, events, exhibitions, and organizational information, targeting architects, students, and the interested public. It operates as a non-profit entity with a focus on education and cultural promotion of architecture. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using popular themes and plugins, providing a moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. Security-wise, the site benefits from HTTPS but lacks important security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, indicating room for improvement in security maturity. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching d-a-r.hr

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
GDPR outside view
25
Average
37

Not counted

  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association holds a solid regional position with active partnerships and sponsorships from local and national organizations. Its business model revolves around membership services, event organization, and cultural promotion. The presence of multiple partner logos and event announcements indicates a well-established network. The target audience includes architecture professionals and the general public interested in architecture. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, supporting the association's mission and outreach efforts.

Security posture

The website has a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, which is mandatory. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a security.txt file and incident response contacts suggests limited readiness for handling security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Introduce cookie consent mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Regularly audit and update plugins and themes to avoid vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
DRUŠTVO ARHITEKATA RIJEKA
VAT number
OIB: 02738753386
Registration number
MB: 03347761
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Društvo Arhitekata Rijeka
Description
Društvo Arhitekata Rijeka is a professional association of architects based in Rijeka, Croatia. It organizes events, exhibitions, lectures, workshops, and professional excursions related to architecture and urbanism. The website provides news, information about membership, sections, organizational bodies, statutes, and meeting minutes.
Key services
Professional events, Exhibitions, Workshops, Lectures, Membership services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, PHP, CSS, JavaScript
Frameworks
Total WordPress Theme, WPBakery Page Builder (js_composer), Getwid Blocks
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based site for a Croatian architects' association.
  2. Content is rich with event announcements and organizational information.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented in the header.
  5. No security.txt or incident response contacts found.
  6. No advertising or tracking services detected.
  7. Good use of HTTPS but lacks security headers.
  8. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with the Total WordPress Theme and WPBakery Page Builder, supported by jQuery and various CSS/JS libraries. The site loads a moderate number of resources (138 queries) with a load time under one second, indicating acceptable performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data beyond minimal schema.org WebPage markup. Accessibility features are basic, with skip links and some ARIA labels but no extensive accessibility enhancements. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with d-a-r.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review d-a-r.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.