Skip to main content

Security report for czechtourism.com

CzechTourism · Government · Czech Republic

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CzechTourism is a government agency under the Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic, focused on promoting tourism within the country. The website serves as an official platform to disseminate information and market the Czech Republic as a travel destination. The site uses modern web technologies such as Vue.js and integrates marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of visible privacy and cookie policies and lack of security headers suggest areas for improvement in compliance and security. The WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, which is justified for a government entity. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could enhance its security posture and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching czechtourism.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates as a national tourism promoter, targeting tourists and travel professionals. Its business model is government-funded, focusing on marketing and information services rather than direct commercial transactions. The site reflects a consistent brand aligned with official government standards. The lack of visible contact information or detailed business registration data on the site limits direct business intelligence but aligns with typical government agency practices. The use of modern frontend frameworks and marketing tools suggests an intent to maintain a contemporary digital presence.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces its defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is present, which could be improved to enhance security transparency. The lack of visible privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from implementing best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers to improve protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident contacts to improve trust and response readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update SSL/TLS configurations and frontend dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CzechTourism
Description
Agentura CzechTourism je státní příspěvkovou organizací, jejímž zřizovatelem je Ministerstvo pro místní rozvoj ČR a jež vyvíjí svou činnost v souladu s cíli zřizovatele, zřizovací listinou a platným statutem.
Key services
tourism promotion, information dissemination, marketing Czech Republic as travel destination
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Material Design Icons, Google Fonts, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional government tourism agency site for Czech Republic
  2. No WHOIS data available publicly, likely due to privacy or registry policies
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML snippet
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content
  5. Uses modern frontend technology (Vue.js) and standard marketing tools (Google Tag Manager)
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content
  8. No WAF or blocking detected, content fully accessible
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js, a modern JavaScript framework, and uses Material Design Icons and Google Fonts for UI consistency. It relies on a custom CMS hosted at cms.czechtourism.cz. Performance appears moderate with preloading of key scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are properly implemented. However, accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced. The lack of visible security headers and privacy mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not evident from the data provided.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with czechtourism.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review czechtourism.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.