Skip to main content

Security report for cz-ceb.com

C.E.B., a.s. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

C.E.B., a.s. is a professional insurance brokerage and risk management company operating primarily in the Czech Republic, serving businesses and government sectors including energy, transport, banking, and public administration. The company emphasizes nearly two decades of tradition, professionalism, and individualized client service, supported by its partnership with RENOMIA GROUP, which provides access to a broad product portfolio and competitive insurance conditions. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as Next.js, React, and integrated analytics tools like Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement and Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form protection, alongside a cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency, which should be addressed to enhance trust. Overall, the site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information and client testimonials, supporting a high level of business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cz-ceb.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
67
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cz-ceb.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cz-ceb.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as an important player in the insurance brokerage market with a focus on corporate and governmental clients. Its business model revolves around providing tailored insurance solutions and risk management services, leveraging its affiliation with RENOMIA GROUP to offer extensive product options. The website content and client testimonials indicate strong customer satisfaction and operational professionalism. The presence of a client zone portal suggests a commitment to customer service and digital engagement. Growth indicators include a diversified sector focus and a comprehensive service offering including claims liquidation. Strategic partnerships and a consistent brand presence reinforce its market position. However, the lack of visible domain registration details could impact perceived legitimacy and should be monitored.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enabled and the use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to protect forms from automated abuse. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could be exploited in certain attack scenarios. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content analysis. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness perception. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adding security headers and formalizing incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide dedicated incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration details to ensure transparency and enhance trustworthiness.
  4. Expand privacy documentation to include detailed data retention policies and user rights information.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
C.E.B., a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
C.E.B., a.s.
Description
Nezávislý pojišťovací zprostředkovatel s více než desetiletou tradicí. Nabízíme odborné a individuální řešení pro firmy, státní správu, dopravu, zemědělství, bankovnictví, letecký průmysl a energetiku.
Key services
insurance brokerage, risk management, insurance for firms, insurance for public sector, claims liquidation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, Cookie Script
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • reCAPTCHA Enterprise for forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. Professional insurance brokerage business with clear service offerings
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics
  4. No obvious security vulnerabilities detected in content
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy
  6. Privacy and cookie policies present and GDPR compliant
  7. Contact information is clear and complete
  8. No terms of service or security policy pages found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React and Next.js framework, ensuring server-side rendering and good performance. It uses advanced analytics and tracking tools such as Microsoft Clarity and Google Tag Manager, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for form security. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. The use of a cookie consent management tool indicates attention to privacy compliance. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the use of Google Cloud Storage for assets and a European image proxy suggests a cloud-based hosting environment. Performance is fast with efficient asset loading and preloading strategies. Technical risks are minimal but could include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which should be monitored for vulnerabilities or privacy issues.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cz-ceb.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cz-ceb.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.