Skip to main content

Security report for cyklohk.cz

Královéhradecká krajská centrála cestovního ruchu, příspěvková organizace · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.cyklohk.cz serves as the official regional tourism portal for cycling in the Královéhradecký region of the Czech Republic. It provides detailed cycling tips, routes, trail information, and seasonal cycling bus services aimed at tourists, cycling enthusiasts, and families. The site is managed by the Královéhradecká krajská centrála cestovního ruchu, a regional tourism organization, and is supported by the Czech Ministry for Regional Development. The content is primarily in Czech with multilingual support for English, German, and Polish, enhancing accessibility for international visitors. Technically, the website is built on the Public4u CMS platform and utilizes jQuery and JavaScript libraries for interactive features. It employs HTTPS for secure communication and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a good SEO foundation, although accessibility features could be improved. The cookie policy and consent mechanism are implemented, but explicit privacy and terms of service pages are missing. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks certain security headers that could enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, reducing trust in domain legitimacy despite the official nature of the organization and the professional presentation of the website. Overall, the website is a reliable and professional resource for cycling tourism in the region, but it would benefit from improved transparency regarding privacy policies, enhanced security headers, and resolution of WHOIS data availability to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cyklohk.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a key regional tourism information hub, focusing on cycling-related activities in Královéhradecký kraj. Its competitive advantage lies in official backing by a government-affiliated tourism organization and comprehensive, localized content tailored to various cycling skill levels and interests. The business model is non-commercial, aimed at promoting regional tourism and supporting local economic development through visitor engagement. Revenue streams likely include government funding and grants, as indicated by project acknowledgments. The target customers are domestic and international tourists interested in cycling and outdoor recreation. The partnership ecosystem includes regional tourism bodies, the Ministry for Regional Development, and digital service providers like as4u.cz. Strategic observations suggest opportunities for growth through enhanced digital marketing, expanded multilingual content, and improved user engagement features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of secure forms with hidden fields and disabled autocomplete indicates attention to input security. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could be exploited by attackers. The lack of a security.txt file or explicit incident response contact channels limits transparency and readiness for vulnerability reporting. Compliance with GDPR is partially addressed through cookie consent but lacks a comprehensive privacy policy. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public informational site but requires enhancements to meet higher standards and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data collection, usage, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add terms of service to clarify user responsibilities and legal disclaimers.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  4. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to enhance domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Královéhradecká krajská centrála cestovního ruchu, příspěvková organizace
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Královéhradecká krajská centrála cestovního ruchu, příspěvková organizace
Description
Website provides comprehensive cycling tourism information for the Královéhradecký region in the Czech Republic, including cycling tips, trails, routes, and seasonal bike bus services.
Key services
Cycling route guides, Trail information, Seasonal cycling bus schedules, Tourist information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, JavaScript, CSS, SVG
Frameworks
Public4u CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with hidden fields and autocomplete off

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional tourism portal focused on cycling in Královéhradecký kraj, Czech Republic.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and includes Google Analytics for tracking.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Cookie policy and consent mechanism present.
  6. Contact information includes official email and physical address of the regional tourism organization.
  7. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked.
  8. Website content is in Czech with language switch options for English, German, and Polish.
  9. Site uses Public4u CMS and jQuery-based scripts.
  10. No signs of malware, phishing, or adult content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Public4u CMS platform, leveraging jQuery and JavaScript for dynamic content and user interaction. It uses SVG graphics for maps and icons, enhancing visual quality and scalability. The site includes responsive design elements and mobile menu scripts, indicating mobile optimization efforts. Performance is moderate, with multiple external scripts and images that could be optimized further. SEO is supported by meta tags including keywords and descriptions, and multilingual support is implemented via language switch links. Accessibility is basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cyklohk.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cyklohk.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.