Skip to main content

Security report for cyfrowe-miasto.pl

Bprog Sp. z o.o. · Government · Poland

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cyfrowe Miasto is a Polish company specializing in digital solutions for local governments, focusing on virtual resident cards and municipal portals. Their platform enables cities and municipalities to engage residents through loyalty programs, digital services, and integrated communication portals. The company positions itself as a key player in the smart city and e-government sector in Poland, serving municipalities such as Poznań, Ząbki, Ustrzyki Dolne, and Tarnowo Podgórne. The business model targets both government entities and residents as end users, providing digital transformation tools to improve local administration and citizen engagement. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Salesmanago marketing automation. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices and basic accessibility features. The CMS appears custom or proprietary, supporting multiportal management for municipalities. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements Google reCAPTCHA on forms, alongside a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. However, it lacks visible security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced security headers. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is consistent and transparent, with domain registration appropriate for the business age. Overall, Cyfrowe Miasto demonstrates a solid digital presence with good business credibility and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security transparency and incident response readiness would enhance trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cyfrowe-miasto.pl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cyfrowe Miasto operates in the government technology sector, providing digital resident card systems and municipal portals. Their competitive advantage lies in integrated solutions that combine loyalty programs, digital identity, and city services. Revenue streams likely include software licensing, implementation services, and ongoing support contracts with municipalities. The target customers are local governments and their residents. The company shows growth through multiple municipal client references and partnerships with local governments. The partnership with Bprog Sp. z o.o. strengthens their technical capabilities. The business ecosystem includes municipal clients, technology partners, and marketing automation providers. The company’s operations focus on digital transformation in public administration, positioning it well in the growing smart city market in Poland.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. GDPR compliance is evident through cookie consent and privacy policy implementation. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response contacts, and security.txt file indicates gaps in transparency and readiness. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The use of third-party tracking and marketing tools is managed with user consent, aligning with privacy regulations. To improve security posture, the company should implement security headers, publish incident response procedures, and consider vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. These steps would reduce risk and enhance stakeholder trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bprog Sp. z o.o.
Description
Tworzenie cyfrowej przyszłości dla jednostek samorządu terytorialnego, wirtualna karta mieszkańca, portale internetowe dla miast i gmin.
Key services
Wirtualna Karta Mieszkańca (Virtual Resident Card), Cyfrowy Portal (Digital Portal for cities), Multiportal CMS for municipal websites
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA, Salesmanago marketing automation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM implied)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Salesmanago
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong focus on digital solutions for local governments and residents.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented with GDPR compliance.
  4. Multiple tracking and marketing tools are used with user consent.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  6. No terms of service page found.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and forms.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery and various third-party analytics and marketing scripts including Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and Salesmanago. The CMS appears custom-built for multiportal management, supporting municipal clients. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing scripts and images. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced for better compliance. Hosting details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals but would benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cyfrowe-miasto.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cyfrowe-miasto.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.