Skip to main content

Security report for cybiah.eu

CYBIAH · Government · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CYBIAH is a cybersecurity support program coordinated by Campus Cyber, targeting small and medium enterprises (TPE/PME), social economy actors, and local governments in the Île-de-France region. It offers comprehensive cybersecurity services including awareness, maturity evaluation, personalized diagnostics, and tailored solutions. The program is fully funded through European Union co-financing and regional partnerships, positioning it as a key regional initiative for digital security enhancement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics tools like HubSpot and Matomo, but suffers from a critical lack of HTTPS support due to an invalid SSL certificate, impacting its security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site provides professional, relevant content with good user experience but requires urgent security improvements.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of cybiah.eu. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cybiah.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CYBIAH operates as a government and non-profit sector initiative, leveraging EU and regional funding to provide free cybersecurity support to eligible organizations. Its market positioning is strong within the Île-de-France region, supported by partnerships with regional authorities and cybersecurity institutions. The business model focuses on service delivery rather than revenue generation, emphasizing trust and public value. The target audience includes small businesses, social economy entities, and local municipalities, reflecting a niche but critical market segment. The program's ecosystem includes partners like Campus Cyber, Région Île-de-France, and Métropole du Grand Paris, enhancing its credibility and reach. Growth potential lies in expanding awareness and uptake among eligible organizations.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS enforcement, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No modern TLS protocols are enabled, and critical security headers are missing, reducing protection against common web attacks. However, the domain implements SPF and DMARC with a strict reject policy, mitigating email spoofing risks. No known vulnerabilities or subdomain takeover issues were detected. The contact forms use Google reCAPTCHA to prevent spam, and privacy policies indicate GDPR compliance. Overall, the site requires immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of HTTP security headers to improve trust and protect user data.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Optimize website performance to reduce page load times and improve user experience.
  5. Maintain and regularly update all plugins and third-party libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  6. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  7. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and preparedness.
  8. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CYBIAH est un programme d'accompagnement en cybersécurité à destination des PME et des collectivités d'Île-de-France coordonné par le Campus Cyber
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.5.3 with plugins including Contact Form 7, HubSpot integration, Matomo analytics, and Google reCAPTCHA. It uses modern frontend libraries like Swiper.js and Axios. Hosting is managed via Gandi DNS and mail services through Outlook protection. The site is SEO optimized with Yoast SEO and includes structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. However, the site suffers from slow load times (~15.7 seconds) and lacks HTTPS due to an invalid SSL certificate, which is a critical technical risk. The absence of TLS protocols and security headers further weakens the technical security posture. Mobile optimization and responsive design are good, but accessibility is only basic. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cybiah.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cybiah.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.