Skip to main content

Security report for cwdltd.co.uk

Complete Window and Door Limited · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Complete Window and Door Limited is a UK-based company specializing in commercial aluminium fenestration products including windows, doors, and curtain walling. With over 25 years of experience, the company has served a diverse client base including government entities, broadcasters, and main contractors. Their business model encompasses full project management from survey and design through manufacture and installation, as well as offering individual services separately. The company ceased trading as of March 10, 2026, as stated on the website. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using common plugins and technologies, with moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and some security practices, but lacks explicit security headers and privacy policies, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but limited by missing WHOIS data and privacy documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cwdltd.co.uk

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid market position in the manufacturing and installation of aluminium fenestration products, targeting commercial and residential construction sectors primarily in the UK. Their competitive advantage lies in bespoke fabrication capabilities and a comprehensive service offering. The website reflects a small-sized enterprise with a regional focus and a history of reputable clients. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and limited digital marketing tools suggest a traditional business approach with limited online customer engagement. No social media presence was detected, which may limit brand visibility and customer interaction in the digital space.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses security plugins such as Wordfence, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are published, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. The website does not appear to use extensive tracking or analytics, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance web security.
  3. Publish incident response and security contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Complete Window and Door Limited
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Complete Window and Door Limited
Description
Complete Windows and Doors Commercial Aluminium Screens, Design, Supply and Manufacture of Aluminium Windows, Doors and Curtain Walling, Wolverhampton, West Midlands. The company offers commercial aluminium fenestration services including survey, design, manufacture, and installation. They have completed projects in the UK and abroad for schools, churches, health centres, hospitals, government buildings, and residential properties. They have an established fabrication facility and provide bespoke windows, doors, and curtain walling.
Key services
Commercial windows, Doors and screens, Curtain walling, Miscellaneous glazing products, Residential doors and windows, Project management and installation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, FlexSlider, All in One SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, SiteOrigin Panels, MetaSlider
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugin Wordfence (indicated by script)
  • Secure contact forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
All in One SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rules error.
  3. Website announces cessation of trading as of March 10, 2026.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in footer.
  5. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  6. Website uses WordPress with common plugins and standard technologies.
  7. Security headers are not explicitly present in HTML content.
  8. No social media links detected.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond WordPress standard.
  10. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with plugins including All in One SEO, Contact Form 7, SiteOrigin Panels, and MetaSlider. It uses jQuery and FlexSlider for UI components. The site has moderate performance and basic mobile responsiveness. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and breadcrumb. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA attributes in sliders. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy mechanisms. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rule violations, which is unusual and may indicate domain configuration issues or aliasing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cwdltd.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cwdltd.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.