Skip to main content

Security report for cvideo.no

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website cvideo.no is currently inaccessible due to a Cloudflare 525 SSL handshake failure error, indicating that Cloudflare cannot establish a secure SSL connection with the origin server. This results in the website content being completely blocked and replaced by a Cloudflare error page. No business, contact, or privacy-related information is available on the page, severely limiting the ability to assess the company's operations or compliance posture. The domain was registered in 2014, suggesting some longevity, but lack of registrant details and website content reduces trust. From a technical perspective, the site relies on Cloudflare as a proxy service, but the origin server's SSL configuration is misconfigured or incompatible, causing the failure. No CMS, analytics, or marketing technologies are detectable due to the blocked content. Security posture is weak given the SSL failure and absence of security headers or policies. Privacy compliance cannot be evaluated as no privacy or cookie policies are present. Overall, the site exhibits critical accessibility and security issues that prevent meaningful analysis of business credibility or compliance. The primary risk is the SSL misconfiguration that blocks user access and undermines trust. Strategic remediation of SSL settings and restoration of website content are essential to enable further evaluation and improve security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cvideo.no

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cvideo.no, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
699
Employees
0
Customers
699
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
4%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cvideo.no.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible website content and absence of business information, it is not possible to provide detailed business intelligence. The domain age indicates the business may have been established since 2014, but no data on market positioning, services, or partnerships is available. No contact or legal information is present to verify legitimacy or operational scale. The lack of visible marketing or analytics tools suggests minimal digital maturity or current online engagement.

Security posture

The security posture is currently poor due to the SSL handshake failure preventing secure HTTPS connections to the origin server. This is a critical vulnerability that blocks all user access and indicates misconfiguration of SSL certificates or cipher suites. No security headers or policies are present on the error page. There is no evidence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The site is protected by Cloudflare at the edge, but the origin server's SSL issues negate this benefit. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations cannot be assessed due to missing privacy information.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve SSL configuration issues on the origin server to ensure compatibility with Cloudflare and enable HTTPS connections.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to demonstrate GDPR compliance.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Deploy security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  5. Establish vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts to improve security transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Cloudflare detected. Website is showing a Cloudflare 525 SSL handshake failed error page indicating origin server SSL issues and content is blocked. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently inaccessible due to SSL handshake failure between Cloudflare and origin server.
  2. No visible business or contact information on the error page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  5. Only external domain referenced is cloudflare.com for error explanation.
  6. No scripts or analytics detected beyond Cloudflare error page assets.
  7. No social media or contact emails found.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain created in 2014 but no registrant details provided.
  9. Website content is minimal and blocked by Cloudflare error page.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is currently served behind Cloudflare but fails to establish SSL connections to the origin server, resulting in a 525 error page. The HTML content is minimal and only contains Cloudflare error messaging and styling. No CMS, JavaScript libraries, or analytics tools are detected. The site lacks meta tags beyond basic charset and viewport settings. Performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility cannot be assessed due to blocked content. The domain is aged but no hosting provider beyond Cloudflare is identified. Technical debt is evident in the SSL misconfiguration that critically impacts availability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cvideo.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cvideo.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.