Skip to main content

Security report for csobam.cz

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.csobam.cz is currently inaccessible due to a security mechanism likely implemented as a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or bot protection challenge. The HTML content is minimal and contains obfuscated JavaScript, preventing access to any meaningful business or contact information. The WHOIS lookup returned no data, indicating either domain privacy protection or a registration issue. Consequently, no metadata, forms, external links, or business details could be extracted. The lack of accessible content and WHOIS data severely limits the ability to assess the company's market position, services, or compliance posture. The security posture is weak from an external perspective due to missing HTTPS and security headers information, but this may be due to the blocking mechanism rather than actual site configuration. Overall, the site appears to be protected by a security layer that restricts automated access, which impacts the ability to perform a full analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching csobam.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
65
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible content and WHOIS data, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears to be related to a financial or banking entity based on the domain name (csobam), but no explicit business model, market positioning, or service offerings are visible. No contact or certification information is available to validate the company's legitimacy or operational scale. The lack of transparency and publicly available data suggests a need for improved digital presence and compliance disclosures.

Security posture

The security posture assessment is limited by the lack of accessible content and metadata. The presence of a JavaScript challenge indicates some level of security control to prevent automated access, which is positive. However, no security headers or SSL certificate details were found in the provided data. The absence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and contact information for incident response reduces compliance with GDPR and other regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but this is due to the inability to access the site fully. Overall, the security posture is indeterminate but likely incomplete from a compliance standpoint.

Recommendations

  1. Ensure the website is accessible to legitimate users and search engines by configuring WAF rules to avoid overblocking.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Provide visible contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Implement and verify WHOIS data publication to improve domain transparency and legitimacy.
  5. Add standard security headers and ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Minimal HTML content with JavaScript challenge script detected, no actual website content accessible, indicating a WAF or security challenge page. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible or blocked by security mechanisms.
  2. No meaningful HTML content or metadata available for analysis.
  3. No contact, policy, or business information found.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  5. No external links or social media references detected.
  6. JavaScript challenge present, likely a WAF or bot protection.
  7. No security headers or SSL details available from provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves minimal HTML content with obfuscated JavaScript likely intended for bot detection or challenge. No CMS, frameworks, or external libraries could be identified. The lack of metadata and structured data indicates a very basic or placeholder site state. Performance and accessibility cannot be assessed due to content blocking. The technical infrastructure appears to rely on a security layer that restricts automated access, which may impact SEO and user experience negatively. Modernization and content enrichment are recommended once access issues are resolved.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with csobam.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review csobam.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.