Skip to main content

Security report for csm.lv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at csm.lv is currently inaccessible, returning an HTTP 403 Forbidden error indicating that access to the resource is denied. Due to this, no meaningful content, metadata, or business information could be extracted or analyzed. The lack of accessible content and absence of WHOIS data (due to query limit restrictions) severely limits the ability to assess the company's business operations, market position, or technical infrastructure. The site appears to be either restricted by server configuration or protected by security mechanisms that prevent public access. From a technical perspective, the server runs Apache 2.4.18 on Ubuntu, but no modern web technologies, CMS, or analytics tools could be detected. The security posture is weak as no security headers or policies are present, and the site is not accessible via HTTPS or any other secure means visible in the provided data. Privacy compliance and contact information are entirely missing, which raises concerns about transparency and regulatory adherence. Overall, the risk assessment is high due to the lack of accessible information, absence of security and privacy policies, and inability to verify domain registration details. Strategic recommendations include resolving the access restrictions to enable content visibility, implementing robust security headers and HTTPS, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and ensuring WHOIS data is accessible for trust verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching csm.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible website content and missing WHOIS data, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears to be either new or protected, but no company name, sector, or market positioning information is available. There are no indications of partnerships, subsidiaries, or business models. The absence of contact details and policies further limits insights into the company's operations or customer engagement strategies.

Security posture

The current security posture is poor. The site is inaccessible due to a 403 Forbidden error, which may be intentional for security or misconfiguration. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement are evident. The absence of privacy policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates low maturity in security and compliance. The inability to access WHOIS data further complicates trust verification. Immediate remediation should focus on enabling secure access, implementing security best practices, and publishing compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve the HTTP 403 Forbidden error to allow legitimate users access to the website content.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to demonstrate GDPR and other regulatory compliance.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  6. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and accurate to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  7. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  8. Improve website content quality and technical implementation to enhance user experience and SEO.
  9. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to engage with security researchers.
  10. Develop a long-term security strategy including monitoring, incident response, and compliance management.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. HTTP 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is denied by server configuration or security rules. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Apache/2.4.18, Ubuntu
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible due to HTTP 403 Forbidden error.
  2. No metadata, scripts, forms, or external links detected in the HTML content.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or business details available on the site.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no domain registration details extracted.
  6. Site appears to be blocked or restricted by server configuration or security rules.
  7. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
  8. Security posture is poor due to lack of accessible content and missing security headers.
  9. AI scoring is heavily penalized due to blocked content and lack of data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache 2.4.18 server running Ubuntu. No CMS, frameworks, or modern web technologies were detected due to the lack of accessible content. The site returns a 403 Forbidden error, indicating restricted access likely due to server configuration or security controls. No metadata, scripts, or external resources were found, suggesting minimal or no public-facing content. Performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility cannot be assessed. The lack of HTTPS or security headers is a significant technical risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure appears basic and possibly outdated, with critical access issues preventing further analysis.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with csm.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review csm.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.