Skip to main content

Security report for csefconference.com

P3C Media · Government · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Email security and GDPR outside view.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The 2025 CSEF Conference website represents a professional event platform organized by P3C Media, a division of Access Intelligence. The conference focuses on economic growth through innovation in sports and entertainment facility development, targeting a broad audience including government officials, developers, and industry professionals. The site provides comprehensive event details, speaker profiles, sponsor information, and registration options, reflecting a mature business model centered on event hosting and industry networking. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern integrations such as Google Tag Manager, Osano for cookie consent, and New Relic for performance monitoring. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and privacy compliance evident, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response documentation. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that reduces trustworthiness from a domain registration perspective. However, the website content and branding are consistent with a legitimate business operation. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, business credibility, and privacy compliance, with room for improvement in technical security and transparency. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a terms of service and incident response policy, and verifying domain registration details to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching csefconference.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
85
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

P3C Media operates in the government and hospitality sectors, organizing the CSEF Conference which serves as a key industry event for sports and entertainment facility development. The business model relies on event registration fees, sponsorships, and exhibitor participation. The company leverages partnerships with Access Intelligence and uses third-party platforms for registration and marketing. The target market includes public sector entities, developers, architects, and industry suppliers. The conference's market position is strong within its niche, supported by notable keynote speakers and a broad sponsor base. Growth indicators include detailed event programming and active audience engagement through subscription and social media sharing. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving multiple related domains and service providers.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent managed via Osano, indicating GDPR compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies are absent, which could impact readiness for security incidents. The use of reputable third-party services like New Relic and Google Tag Manager indicates a professional approach to monitoring and analytics. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  2. Publish a clear incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure consistency and improve trustworthiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader audience inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from external dependencies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Access Intelligence, LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
P3C Media
Description
The Convention, Sports & Entertainment Facilities Conference (CSEF) is an event focused on economic growth through innovation in sports and entertainment development, bringing together industry leaders, stakeholders, and visionaries to explore major venue development, financing, sustainability, and operational strategies.
Key services
Annual conference event, Networking opportunities, Sponsorship and exhibition, Educational sessions and keynote speakers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Publisher Tags (GPT), Osano Consent Management, New Relic Browser monitoring
Frameworks
Yoast SEO, Views plugin for WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent via Osano
  • Privacy policy linked
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
New Relic Browser, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager
Tracking pixels
New Relic Browser, AddThis
Marketing tools
Osano Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional conference site for the 2025 CSEF Conference organized by P3C Media.
  2. Content is rich with detailed event information, speakers, sponsors, registration pricing, and contact details.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented with Osano consent management.
  4. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  5. No visible security headers detected in the HTML source; HTTPS is enforced.
  6. Multiple external scripts and ad networks are used, including Google Tag Manager and New Relic.
  7. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  8. Contact emails and phone numbers are present and clearly labeled.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme tailored for event management. It uses jQuery and integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Publisher Tags for analytics and advertising. Osano provides cookie consent management, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with some use of CDN resources and asynchronous script loading. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format for event and breadcrumb markup. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of some security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with csefconference.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review csefconference.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.