Skip to main content

Security report for csc.lv

CSC Telecom · Telecommunications · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CSC Telecom is a Latvian telecommunications company specializing in providing a wide range of telecommunication and IT services including IP telephony, cloud PBX, SMS marketing, contact center outsourcing, and IT infrastructure maintenance. The company positions itself as a leader in customer service solutions within the Baltic region, targeting business clients seeking digital communication and telephony solutions. The website content is professionally presented, with clear navigation and multilingual support, indicating a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, and SEO optimizations, ensuring good performance and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and privacy compliance mechanisms in place, including cookie consent and a comprehensive privacy policy. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit incident response policies. Overall, the website reflects a trustworthy and professional business with moderate risk and good compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching csc.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CSC Telecom operates primarily in the telecommunications sector, offering B2B services focused on digital communication solutions. Their business model revolves around providing integrated telephony and IT services to enterprises, leveraging partnerships with related service domains like TravelSIM and Turbo Card. The company demonstrates a strong market position in Latvia and the Baltic region, supported by a comprehensive service portfolio and digitalization initiatives. Revenue streams likely include telephony services, cloud solutions, SMS marketing, and IT infrastructure support. The company targets medium to large businesses requiring advanced communication infrastructure. Their digital maturity is evidenced by multilingual content, structured data, and active social media engagement. Strategic partnerships and a focus on customer service digitalization indicate growth orientation and competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests potential areas for enhancement. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, which could impact transparency and readiness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, limiting external reporting channels. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by adopting additional security best practices and publishing formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with best practices and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CSC Telecom
Description
CSC Telecom provides telecommunication services and solutions in Latvia, including IP telephony, SMS marketing, cloud PBX, contact center solutions, and IT infrastructure services.
Key services
IP telephony, Cloud PBX, SMS marketing, Contact center outsourcing, IT infrastructure maintenance, CRM integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, WordPress, Yoast SEO, Autoptimize, LazySizes
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. Multiple contact emails and phone numbers clearly labeled for sales and support.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, and Twitter.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  7. Good SEO and structured data implementation.
  8. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, reCAPTCHA, and Autoptimize for performance optimization. The site uses lazy loading for images and polyfills for browser compatibility, indicating attention to performance and user experience. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Performance is moderate with potential for improvement through enhanced caching and security header implementation. The technical infrastructure supports the business model effectively but should incorporate additional security controls and accessibility improvements to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with csc.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review csc.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.