Skip to main content

Security report for csaom.org

PrivacyGuardian.org llc · Other · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website csaom.org operates as a Chinese-language platform primarily focused on providing downloads and information related to lottery and gambling applications. It targets a niche audience interested in lottery gaming apps and related software, offering various app download links and promotional content. The business model revolves around app distribution and promotion within the gambling sector, with a market position that is niche and specialized. Technically, the website is built on the ThinkPHP framework and utilizes older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.11.1 and Unslider for UI components. It employs Matomo analytics for user tracking and uses Cloudflare for DNS services. The site demonstrates basic mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks advanced accessibility features and modern performance optimizations. From a security perspective, the website lacks HTTPS enforcement and does not implement common security headers, which exposes users to potential risks. There are no visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and no contact information for security incidents or data protection officers is provided. The WHOIS data reveals privacy protection with a registrant organization unrelated to the website content, which raises concerns about legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site presents moderate risks due to its gambling-related content, lack of security best practices, and limited transparency. Strategic improvements in security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility are recommended to enhance trust and user safety.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching csaom.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention csaom.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for csaom.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform serves a specialized market segment focused on lottery and gambling app users, primarily Chinese-speaking individuals. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating and promoting various lottery apps and related acceleration services. Revenue streams likely include affiliate commissions from app downloads and advertising partnerships. The target customer segment is mature users interested in gambling apps. The partnership ecosystem includes multiple acceleration and VPN service providers, some of which have suspicious domain reputations. The business shows signs of operating with privacy protection and limited transparency, which may impact growth and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low, with critical gaps including absence of HTTPS, missing security headers, and lack of privacy and cookie policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. Data protection practices are minimal, and there is no indication of compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. The presence of numerous external links to suspicious domains further increases risk exposure. The security culture appears weak, with no visible trust signals or certifications.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user data and improve trust.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with data protection regulations.
  3. Add clear contact information and establish an incident response process for security issues.
  4. Audit and remove suspicious external links to reduce risk of malware or phishing.
  5. Enhance security headers and adopt best practices such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PrivacyGuardian.org llc
Description
The website offers downloads and information related to lottery and gambling apps, including various lottery platforms and tools. It targets users interested in lottery gaming apps and related software.
Key services
Lottery app downloads, Lottery platform information, Links to related acceleration and VPN services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.1, Unslider, Matomo Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
ThinkPHP
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible with no WAF blocking
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact or security incident response information available
  4. Website promotes lottery and gambling apps targeting Chinese users
  5. Many external links to acceleration and VPN services and suspicious domains
  6. No HTTPS or security headers detected in provided data
  7. Basic technical implementation with older jQuery version
  8. Moderate use of tracking via Matomo analytics
  9. Content safety rated questionable due to gambling content
  10. WHOIS data shows privacy protection and mismatch with website content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses an older technology stack with ThinkPHP framework and jQuery 1.11.1, which may have known vulnerabilities. Performance is moderate but could benefit from modernization and optimization. The site lacks HTTPS and security headers, which are critical technical debts. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. The use of Matomo analytics indicates some level of user tracking but without clear privacy compliance. Technical risks include potential exposure to attacks due to outdated libraries and missing security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with csaom.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review csaom.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.