Skip to main content

Security report for cryptomania.cz

Cryptomania s.r.o. · Other · Czech Republic

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cryptomania s.r.o. operates a niche entertainment website focused on original puzzle hunts, targeting puzzle enthusiasts and gamers primarily in the Czech Republic. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear descriptions of its puzzle hunt events. The business model revolves around organizing and promoting puzzle-based entertainment events, positioning itself as a specialized player in this niche market. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern web technologies including Bootstrap for responsive design, Font Awesome for icons, and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with appropriate meta tags and structured data enhancing search engine visibility. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting good privacy compliance with GDPR. However, it lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response contacts, which could be improved. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content analyzed. Overall, the website is safe, accessible, and professionally maintained, with a moderate to good security posture. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is typical for small businesses and does not detract significantly from trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency would enhance the site's security maturity and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cryptomania.cz

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cryptomania s.r.o. occupies a specialized niche in the entertainment sector, focusing on original puzzle hunts. Its competitive advantage lies in offering unique puzzle events that appeal to a dedicated audience of puzzle enthusiasts. The business model likely includes event organization and possibly ticket sales or subscriptions. The company maintains an active online presence with social media integration, particularly Facebook, to engage its community. Growth indicators include consistent content updates and use of marketing tools like MailerLite. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the data, suggesting a focused operational scope. The company appears to prioritize user engagement and privacy compliance, aligning with European data protection standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, indicating awareness of privacy regulations such as GDPR. The use of reputable analytics and marketing tools is balanced with privacy considerations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No explicit vulnerability disclosure or security incident response information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the business scale but with potential to enhance defenses and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file or a dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents or abuse reports to improve incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security training to foster a security-aware culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cryptomania s.r.o.
Description
Cryptomania - have a clever fun!
Key services
Original puzzle hunts, Puzzle events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Font Awesome, Bootstrap, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, MailerLite, WordPress
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
MailerLite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry restrictions.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the analyzed page.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No explicit security incident response contacts provided.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. Good SEO and mobile optimization observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the WordPress CMS platform, utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and Font Awesome for iconography. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes, alongside MailerLite for email marketing. The site loads JavaScript libraries asynchronously to optimize performance. While the technical stack is modern and well-supported, there is no explicit hosting provider information. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement advanced security configurations to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cryptomania.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cryptomania.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.