Skip to main content

Security report for crushfling.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Crushfling.com is an adult-oriented social platform focused on connecting users for casual dating, sexting, and related interactions via popular messaging apps. Founded in 2021, it offers free access with features such as profile browsing, messaging, and interest-based matching. The platform targets adults seeking casual and consensual relationships, positioning itself as a niche player in the casual dating market. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Alpine.js, Livewire, jQuery, and Swiper.js, with hosting and DNS services provided by NameSilo and Cloudflare respectively. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a generally good user experience with clear navigation and responsive design. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is enforced and a Content-Security-Policy header is present, but DNSSEC is not enabled and other security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. The WHOIS data is consistent with the business age and shows no privacy protection, indicating transparency in domain registration. However, the presence of external links to suspicious affiliate domains without clear disclosure poses a risk to user trust. Overall, the site is functional and professionally designed but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and transparency around advertising partners to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crushfling.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Crushfling operates as a free-to-use adult casual dating platform monetized primarily through advertising and affiliate partnerships. Its market positioning is niche, targeting users interested in sexting and casual hookups via messaging apps. The business model relies on user-generated profiles and engagement features such as messaging and swiping. The platform's growth potential depends on maintaining user trust and expanding its user base while ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The affiliate ecosystem includes domains like inticamps-limidelhi.icu, which should be vetted for reputability. The absence of formal privacy and terms documentation may hinder credibility with privacy-conscious users and regulators. Strategic partnerships and enhanced transparency could improve market position and user retention.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a Content-Security-Policy header to upgrade insecure requests. However, the lack of DNSSEC and other common security headers such as X-Frame-Options and Referrer-Policy indicates room for improvement. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits readiness for security events. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also reflects compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. External affiliate links to suspicious domains increase risk exposure. Overall, while basic security practices are in place, the platform should enhance its security posture by implementing additional headers, enabling DNSSEC, publishing security policies, and vetting third-party partners.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement additional security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Review and vet all external affiliate and advertising domains for trustworthiness and disclose partnerships transparently.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Crushfling is a platform designed to help people find partners for consensual dating, sexting, affairs, hookups, dirty chats, trading, dates, friends with benefits, one-night stands, sex, and roleplay. It offers a safe and secure environment for casual relationships and experiences, open to all sexual preferences and identities. The site is free to use, requires profile creation with basic info, and provides features like messaging, chat, and swipe browsing.
Key services
Profile browsing, Messaging, Sexting partner matching, Interest-based connections
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery 3.7.1, Alpine.js, Livewire, Swiper.js, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Livewire, Alpine.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content-Security-Policy header present
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a niche adult casual dating and sexting platform.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. External links to suspicious affiliate domains may pose user trust risks.
  4. Uses modern frontend technologies and is mobile optimized.
  5. Security headers are minimal; could be improved.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and domain age matches business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack including Alpine.js for reactive components, Livewire for server-driven UI, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Swiper.js for interactive sliders. It leverages Cloudflare DNS and NameSilo as registrar. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and structured JSON-LD data. Performance is moderate with preloading of CSS and JS assets. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation support. Technical debt appears low, but security-related technical improvements are needed. The site relies on external scripts including Google Analytics and third-party affiliate domains, which should be monitored for performance and security impact.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crushfling.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crushfling.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.