Skip to main content

Security report for crossfitriga.lv

SIA CFRIGA · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CrossFit Riga is a fitness center based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in official CrossFit and HYROX training. It positions itself as the largest CrossFit gym in Latvia, focusing on community, coaching, and high intensity functional fitness. The website reflects a modern digital presence built on Next.js and React, with content managed via Payload CMS and hosted on Quickstack infrastructure. The site offers clear information about classes, schedules, plans, and contact details, targeting fitness enthusiasts and visitors to Riga. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and privacy policies, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, but the business information and content quality suggest a legitimate small fitness business. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and improving accessibility and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crossfitriga.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CrossFit Riga operates in the fitness sector, offering specialized CrossFit and HYROX training services. Its market position as the largest CrossFit gym in Latvia and strong community focus provide competitive advantages. The business model relies on memberships, trial classes, and drop-in options, targeting local residents and visitors. The company maintains active social media channels for marketing and engagement. The use of modern web technologies and a CMS indicates a commitment to digital maturity. However, the lack of visible certifications or compliance documentation suggests potential gaps in regulatory adherence. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital marketing, enhancing compliance, and broadening service offerings.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses PostHog for analytics, which requires careful privacy management. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  3. Publish terms of service and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  4. Conduct accessibility audits and improve features to support all users.
  5. Establish a data protection officer contact or privacy point of contact to strengthen data governance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA CFRIGA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA CFRIGA
Description
CrossFit Riga is a fitness center offering official CrossFit and HYROX training. It emphasizes community, coaching, and high intensity functional movements to help clients achieve their fitness goals. The gym is the biggest in Latvia and offers trial classes, drop-in options, and a variety of fitness plans and classes.
Key services
CrossFit training, HYROX training, Fitness classes, Trial classes, Fitness Forge
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, Web fonts (woff2)
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL (https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog
Marketing tools
PushPress
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional fitness gym site with clear branding and service offerings.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact info is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Social media presence is strong with Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube links.
  5. Technical stack is modern using Next.js and React with Payload CMS backend.
  6. Security headers and policies are missing or not detectable in provided data.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit; limits domain trust verification.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern React and Next.js framework, leveraging server-side rendering and static assets hosted on Quickstack's S3 storage. Payload CMS is used for content management, indicating a decoupled headless CMS architecture. The site loads multiple CSS and JavaScript chunks asynchronously, supporting performance optimization. Font loading uses WOFF2 format for efficiency. The site is mobile responsive with good design quality and navigation clarity. However, SEO optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. No explicit hosting provider or CDN is identified beyond Quickstack asset hosting. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through enhanced caching and optimization strategies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crossfitriga.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crossfitriga.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.