Skip to main content

Security report for crossconcreteflooring.com

Cross Concrete Flooring Ltd · Manufacturing · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cross Concrete Flooring Ltd is a small concrete flooring service provider currently in the process of launching a new website. The company presents itself with ISO certifications (ISO 45001, ISO 9001, ISO 14001) as trust indicators and provides clear contact details including phone and email. The website is built on WordPress using a coming soon maintenance plugin, with basic design and minimal content focused on informing visitors about the upcoming site and providing contact information. Technically, the site uses modern web fonts, Font Awesome icons, and AJAX for subscription forms, indicating moderate digital maturity. However, the absence of security headers and privacy/cookie policies highlights gaps in security and compliance. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and incident response information. No tracking or analytics services are detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and domain legitimacy to enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crossconcreteflooring.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, specifically concrete flooring services, targeting construction industry clients. Its business model is service-oriented with a focus on quality and safety as evidenced by ISO certifications. The market position appears local and specialized without explicit claims of scale or parent company affiliations. The website's minimal content and coming soon status suggest a developing digital presence. The presence of a Facebook page indicates some social media engagement. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The company could benefit from expanding its online presence and clarifying business details to improve credibility and customer reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. The absence of incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure policies further weakens security readiness. The WHOIS data absence is a significant concern, impacting trustworthiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, requiring focused improvements to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to improve trust.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy with clear contact channels for security issues.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve site stability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cross Concrete Flooring Ltd
Description
Concrete flooring services company currently developing a new website. Provides contact details for inquiries.
Key services
Concrete flooring installation
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, CMP Coming Soon Maintenance Plugin, Font Awesome 6.7.2, Google Fonts (Merriweather, Fira Sans), Fetch API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URLs

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a coming soon placeholder with minimal content
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact information is provided clearly
  4. ISO certifications displayed as trust indicators
  5. No security headers detected
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  8. WHOIS data missing, domain registration status unclear
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a coming soon maintenance plugin, using modern web fonts and Font Awesome icons. It employs AJAX for subscription form submissions, indicating some interactive functionality. The site loads a background image and uses CSS animations for visual effects. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Mobile optimization is good due to responsive meta tags and font scaling. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced features detected. SEO is minimal with basic meta tags and Open Graph data but no structured JSON-LD data. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but basic, with room for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crossconcreteflooring.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crossconcreteflooring.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.