Skip to main content

Security report for cromiepharmacy.co.uk

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, DNS health and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.cromiepharmacy.co.uk currently serves a security verification page protected by Google reCAPTCHA v3, indicating the presence of a Web Application Firewall or bot protection mechanism. Due to this, no actual business content or services are accessible for analysis. The domain WHOIS lookup failed with an error indicating the domain name contains too many parts, suggesting the domain is invalid or misconfigured under Nominet UK rules. This severely limits the ability to verify the legitimacy or business details of the entity behind the site. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for styling and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot mitigation. However, no other technologies, CMS, or analytics tools are detectable. The site lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and no contact information or business credentials are present. Security headers and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. The security posture is limited to the presence of reCAPTCHA, but the absence of other security headers and policies reduces overall security maturity. The domain registration issues and blocked content result in a low trust and legitimacy score. Overall, the site appears to be either a placeholder, under maintenance, or protected from automated access, preventing meaningful user interaction or business engagement. Strategic recommendations include resolving domain registration issues, publishing clear privacy and cookie policies, providing contact and business information, improving security headers, and ensuring the website content is accessible to legitimate users.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 9 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cromiepharmacy.co.uk

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and invalid domain registration, no concrete business intelligence can be derived. The domain name suggests a pharmacy-related business, but no supporting data confirms this. There are no indications of market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships. The absence of contact details and business credentials further limits business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website employs Google reCAPTCHA v3 as a bot mitigation measure, indicating some level of security awareness. However, the lack of visible security headers, absence of privacy and cookie policies, and invalid domain registration status highlight significant security and compliance gaps. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present. The security posture is minimal and requires substantial improvements to meet standard compliance and trust requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve domain registration issues to ensure the domain is valid and properly registered under Nominet UK.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses to improve business credibility.
  4. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Ensure website content is accessible without excessive bot protection to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page is a security verification with Google reCAPTCHA v3 challenge indicating WAF or bot protection blocking direct access to content. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.3, Google reCAPTCHA v3
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by a Google reCAPTCHA v3 security verification challenge.
  2. No meaningful website content is accessible for analysis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or business details are present.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rules violation.
  6. Technical stack includes Bootstrap 5.3.3 and Google reCAPTCHA v3.
  7. No SEO or accessibility optimizations detected.
  8. No external business-related domains or partners identified.
  9. No analytics or advertising scripts detected beyond reCAPTCHA.
  10. Website appears to be a placeholder or protected page rather than a full business site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Bootstrap 5.3.3 for responsive design and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for invisible bot protection. No CMS or other frameworks are detected. The site is currently a minimal security verification page with no substantive content. Performance and hosting details are unknown. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are minimal or absent. The technical implementation is basic and primarily focused on bot mitigation rather than content delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cromiepharmacy.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cromiepharmacy.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.