Skip to main content

Security report for crocoguide.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CrocoGuide.com operates as an adult content directory specializing in listing free pornographic video sites across various niches. The website targets an adult audience seeking free access to adult entertainment content. Its business model appears to be affiliate or referral-based, directing traffic to external adult video platforms. The site has been operational since 2008, indicating a stable presence in its niche market. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Cloudflare DNS services, but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but lacks comprehensive accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no security headers or DNSSEC, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. No contact or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and trust. Overall, the site is functional but minimalistic with significant room for security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crocoguide.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website holds a niche position as a free adult video site directory, catering exclusively to adults. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating numerous free porn sites categorized by popularity and niche, which may attract traffic from users seeking curated adult content. Revenue likely derives from affiliate marketing or advertising partnerships, though no direct ads or affiliate disclosures are visible on the homepage. The absence of contact details and corporate information suggests a small-scale operation focused on content aggregation rather than direct content creation or service provision. The extensive list of external adult sites indicates a broad partnership or referral ecosystem. Growth potential depends on maintaining up-to-date listings and compliance with adult content regulations.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is basic. HTTPS is enforced, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. No forms or user input fields are present, minimizing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a gap in security readiness. Overall, the site is low risk from a direct attack perspective but lacks proactive security and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to comply with GDPR and other privacy laws.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Improve website accessibility and mobile optimization to enhance user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
CrocoGuide.com is a website that compiles and lists free adult porn video sites categorized by niches and popularity. It offers users a curated directory of free pornographic video sites accessible on desktop and mobile devices.
Key services
compilation of free adult video site links
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a directory of free adult pornographic video sites.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business transparency details provided.
  4. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled but security posture is basic.
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the HTML content.
  6. Content is explicit adult material with clear NSFW classification.
  7. Domain is aged and registered properly but lacks registrant transparency.
  8. No forms or data collection fields present on the homepage.
  9. No social media or email contact links found.
  10. Site uses Cloudflare DNS but no advanced security features like DNSSEC.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services, which can improve performance and availability. The site loads moderately fast but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No analytics or advertising scripts were detected in the provided HTML, indicating minimal tracking or monetization visible on the homepage. The site does not implement DNSSEC and lacks security headers, which are technical risks. The domain is well aged and registered with a reputable registrar, but the lack of registrant transparency and contact details is a technical and business risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is simple and functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crocoguide.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crocoguide.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.