Skip to main content

Security report for crocogirls.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CrocoGirls.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in free pornographic videos and images across a wide range of explicit categories. Established since 2007, it targets an adult audience seeking diverse adult content including teen, milf, anal, lesbian, and fetish genres. The site operates as a content aggregator and portal linking to numerous related adult sites, indicating a niche market position within free adult content providers. Technically, the website employs basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Cloudflare DNS services but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but lacks accessibility features and modern performance enhancements. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no DNSSEC or security headers implemented. Privacy and compliance policies are absent, and no contact or business transparency information is provided, which is common but reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional but has significant gaps in privacy, security best practices, and business credibility. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crocogirls.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult entertainment sector, providing free access to a large catalog of pornographic videos and images. Its business model appears to be content aggregation and traffic monetization through advertising or affiliate links to partner adult sites. The extensive categorization and linking to sister sites suggest a broad partnership ecosystem within the adult content niche. The domain's long registration history supports a stable market presence. However, lack of visible business contact details and compliance documentation limits transparency. The target customer segment is adults seeking free pornographic content. Growth indicators are not visible from the data, but the large number of categories and external links imply a mature content network. The site does not appear to engage in direct sales or subscription services but may rely on advertising revenue. Strategic partnerships with related adult domains enhance its market reach.

Security posture

The website's security posture is basic. HTTPS is enabled, ensuring encrypted communication. The domain status clientTransferProhibited protects against unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options are present, increasing vulnerability to common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are implemented, and cookies are set without explicit user consent, raising compliance concerns. No forms or user input fields were detected, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The absence of incident response contacts or security policies indicates low security maturity. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, implementing privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, and establishing incident response procedures to improve security and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide clear contact information and incident response channels to improve business transparency and security readiness.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
CrocoGirls.com is all about hot girls, naked models and glamour babes. You will find here daily free pictures of most beautiful teens, sexy and nude babes, topless models!
Key services
Free adult videos, Adult image galleries, Categorized adult content, Links to related adult websites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a free adult content portal with extensive pornographic video categories.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links present.
  4. No forms detected for user input or data collection.
  5. Uses Cloudflare DNS but no advanced security headers detected.
  6. Content is explicit adult material targeting adults only.
  7. Multiple external links to related adult websites and sister sites.
  8. Basic technical implementation with no modern frameworks or CMS detected.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts identified in the provided HTML.
  10. No visible security or compliance certifications.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a straightforward technical stack consisting of HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript without detectable modern frameworks or CMS platforms. It relies on Cloudflare for DNS services but does not utilize advanced security features like DNSSEC. The site includes multiple CSS files and inline JavaScript for cookie setting but lacks analytics or tracking scripts in the provided content. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and SEO meta tags present. Accessibility features are minimal. The site structure is simple with categorized content links and no visible forms or interactive elements. There is an opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance accessibility and SEO for better user experience and search engine ranking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crocogirls.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crocogirls.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.