Skip to main content

Security report for crisisresponse.google

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

4 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
3of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching crisisresponse.google

This scan found 5 issues across 2 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
GDPR outside view
68
Average
82
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Google Crisis Response operates as a key component of Google's broader technology ecosystem, focusing on crisis and emergency management. Its market positioning benefits from Google's global brand recognition and technological leadership. The initiative's competitive advantage lies in its integration of AI-driven predictive analytics and trusted information dissemination at scale. Revenue streams are indirect, supporting Google's brand and ecosystem rather than direct monetization. The target customers include governments, NGOs, emergency services, and the general public. Growth indicators include ongoing partnerships and expansion of crisis alert views globally. The partnership ecosystem is robust, involving authoritative partners and leveraging Google's extensive infrastructure. Operationally, the initiative reflects Google's commitment to social responsibility and public safety.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, strong SSL configuration, and multiple security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. No forms on the main page reduce the attack surface. No vulnerable or outdated libraries were detected. However, the absence of a publicly accessible security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and may hinder rapid communication in case of security incidents. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Compliance with GDPR is implied through links to Google's privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be improved by adding explicit security governance documentation and incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page to enhance transparency and user trust.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information or abuse reporting channels.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Maintain and regularly update privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing compliance.
  5. Enhance user engagement by adding accessible contact options for crisis-related inquiries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google
Description
Partnering with those on the front lines to develop technology and programs that help keep people safe, informed, and out of harm’s way. This includes empowering communities with AI-driven predictive modeling and trusted safety information as well as ensuring effective post-disaster relief and supporting long-term recovery.
Key services
AI-driven predictive modeling, Trusted safety information, Post-disaster relief support, Long-term recovery support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hammer.js, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Glue (Google internal framework)
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected
  • No forms collecting sensitive data on main page

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a legitimate Google service focused on crisis response.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. Strong branding and consistent design aligned with Google standards.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the main page.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are linked to official Google policy pages.
  6. No forms present on the main page collecting user data.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and Google internal frameworks.
  8. No security or WAF blocking detected.
  9. External links are primarily to Google-owned or trusted domains.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with crisisresponse.google. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review crisisresponse.google.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.