Skip to main content

Security report for cowcare.eu

CowCare SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CowCare SIA operates a specialized e-commerce platform focused on bovine claw health and hoof trimming products. The company targets veterinarians, hoof trimmers, and farmers, offering a range of products including hoof trimming tools, chutes, gate and transport systems, and branded workwear. The website is professionally designed with multilingual support and clear navigation, positioning CowCare as a niche market leader in agricultural veterinary supplies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor, leveraging modern plugins and security features such as HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA. While the site demonstrates good security practices and performance, it lacks explicit privacy and terms of service policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. Overall, the domain registration is consistent with the business claims, registered through a reputable registrar without privacy protection, enhancing legitimacy. Strategic improvements in privacy documentation and accessibility would further strengthen the company's digital maturity and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cowcare.eu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
33
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CowCare SIA is positioned as a specialist provider in the agricultural and veterinary sector, focusing on hoof trimming and bovine claw health. The business model revolves around B2B and B2C e-commerce sales of specialized equipment and accessories. The company maintains a consistent brand presence with multilingual support to serve an international audience. Key revenue streams likely include product sales of hoof trimming tools, chutes, and protective workwear. The presence of social media channels and structured data indicates a mature digital marketing approach. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent small-sized enterprise. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its niche specialization and comprehensive product range tailored to hoof care professionals.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of security headers, and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response information limits transparency and preparedness communication. The site would benefit from publishing vulnerability disclosure guidelines and incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security maturity is good for a small e-commerce business but can be improved by formalizing security governance documentation and enhancing accessibility compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for security vulnerabilities.
  5. Develop a long-term security strategy including employee training and periodic security assessments.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CowCare SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CowCare SIA
Description
CowCare SIA is a private owned company specialized on bovine claw health. Our team members are located and represented in many countries.
Key services
Hoof trimming products, Hoof trimming chutes, Gate and transport systems, Workwear and merchandising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, Gravity Forms, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, intl-tel-input, WP Rocket
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform specializing in bovine hoof trimming products.
  2. Content is well-structured with multilingual support.
  3. Uses modern WordPress plugins and technologies.
  4. Includes standard security measures like HTTPS and reCAPTCHA.
  5. Lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  6. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided and consistent.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building. It employs several plugins including Gravity Forms for form management and WP Rocket for performance optimization. The site uses Google Fonts, jQuery, and intl-tel-input for enhanced user experience. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and caching mechanisms in place. SEO is well addressed with Rank Math plugin and proper meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter Cards. Hosting is likely provided by GoDaddy as indicated by the registrar information. Technical risks include dependency on multiple third-party plugins which require regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and multilingual support.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cowcare.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cowcare.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.