Skip to main content

Security report for county-taxes.net

Government · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website county-taxes.net serves as an online platform for managing and making payments related to government services, specifically bill payments. The site is relatively new, established in 2021, and uses modern web technologies such as Vue.js and Google Tag Manager. The content is minimal but focused on providing a convenient payment service. The lack of detailed business information, contact details, and policies limits the transparency and trustworthiness of the site. From a technical perspective, the site employs a modern JavaScript framework and is hosted with Cloudflare DNS services. However, there is no evidence of DNSSEC, security headers, or comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, which are important for security and compliance. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenge blocks, indicating no immediate access restrictions. Security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing privacy and cookie policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The domain registration is consistent and appropriate for the business type, registered with a reputable registrar, Cloudflare, Inc. Overall, the site presents a basic but functional government payment service with room for improvement in security, privacy compliance, and business transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching county-taxes.net

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention county-taxes.net, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for county-taxes.net right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the government sector, providing an online payment platform for county taxes or related bills. The business model focuses on facilitating convenient online payments for users, likely targeting residents or taxpayers. The market position is unclear due to limited information, but the use of modern technology suggests an attempt to provide a streamlined digital service. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. Revenue streams likely come from payment processing fees or government contracts. The lack of detailed company information and contact data limits the ability to assess growth indicators or competitive advantages.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. The site uses HTTPS (implied by Cloudflare hosting and scripts loaded over HTTPS), but no security headers were detected in the HTML content. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity for DNS security. No incident response or security policy information is available, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking but no explicit privacy compliance mechanisms are visible. Overall, the site lacks comprehensive security and privacy controls but does not show signs of critical vulnerabilities or data exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support and incident response channels to improve transparency and responsiveness.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities and ensure secure handling of payment data.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Pay bills online in a few simple clicks. Manage and make payments in one convenient platform anytime, anywhere.
Key services
online bill payment, payment management
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-related online payment platform.
  2. Content is minimal and focused on payment services.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  4. No contact information or forms detected in the HTML content.
  5. Uses modern JavaScript frameworks (Vue.js) and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. No security headers or DNSSEC enabled, which could be improved.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Domain is relatively new but registered with a reputable registrar.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework (Vue.js) and loads multiple JavaScript chunks asynchronously, indicating a modular and contemporary front-end architecture. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. Hosting is via Cloudflare DNS, but no CMS or backend platform is explicitly identified. Performance is moderate based on the presence of multiple deferred scripts and preloading animations. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta description tags. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced security and SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with county-taxes.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review county-taxes.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.