Skip to main content

Security report for coss.lv

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at coss.lv is currently inaccessible, presenting a 500 error page with a message indicating the store is unavailable. There is no accessible content, metadata, or structured data to analyze, and no contact or business information is provided. The WHOIS lookup failed due to query limits, preventing extraction of domain registration details. This lack of data and website unavailability severely limits any meaningful business or security analysis. The site appears inactive or possibly suspended, which negatively impacts trust and credibility assessments. From a technical perspective, no technologies, scripts, or security measures are detectable, indicating a minimal or non-operational digital presence. Security posture is poor due to lack of HTTPS and security headers, and privacy compliance cannot be assessed. Overall, the site presents a high risk due to unavailability and lack of transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coss.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of accessible website content and WHOIS data, no concrete business intelligence can be derived. There is no indication of the company's market position, services, or operational status. The domain appears to be either inactive or under maintenance, with no visible business model or customer engagement channels. No partnerships or related domains are identifiable. The lack of contact information and policies suggests the business is not currently operational or publicly engaging customers.

Security posture

The security posture of the domain is currently very weak. The site lacks HTTPS, security headers, and any visible security or privacy policies. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The WHOIS data is inaccessible, preventing verification of domain legitimacy or registrant details. The site’s unavailability and error response increase the risk of phishing or impersonation if the domain is compromised. There is no evidence of compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. Overall, the domain is not secure or trustworthy in its current state.

Recommendations

  1. Restore website availability with proper error handling and content delivery.
  2. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and domain registration details are transparent.
  3. Implement HTTPS with valid SSL/TLS certificates and security headers.
  4. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with regulations.
  5. Add verifiable contact information and incident response channels to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The website returns a 500 error page with a message 'This store is unavailable' and no actual content. WHOIS query limit exceeded error indicates limited access to domain data. No WAF vendor-specific challenge detected but content is blocked or unavailable. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is unavailable and returns a 500 error page.
  2. No metadata, structured data, or SEO tags found.
  3. No forms, no contact information, no social media links detected.
  4. No scripts or external resources loaded.
  5. No security headers or SSL information available.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  7. Website likely inactive or under maintenance.
  8. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  9. No business or security policies present.
  10. No analytics or advertising technologies detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves a minimal static error page with no external scripts, stylesheets beyond inline CSS, or metadata. No CMS or frameworks are detectable. The lack of HTTPS and security headers indicates poor technical implementation. The site is not optimized for SEO or accessibility. Performance cannot be accurately measured due to unavailability. The domain’s hosting provider and infrastructure details are unknown. Overall, the technical setup is minimal and insufficient for a functional commercial website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coss.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coss.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.