Dark web exposure
Add-onLeaked records that mention cospar2026.org, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for cospar2026.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
AIM Group International · Government · Italy
Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.
The website cospar2026.org serves as the official platform for the 46th COSPAR Scientific Assembly scheduled for 2026 in Florence, Italy. It provides comprehensive event-related information including committees, scientific programme, registration details, venue, accommodation, and news updates. The site targets the scientific community involved in space research and related disciplines, positioning itself as a niche event organizer with international reach. The business model revolves around event management and scientific assembly facilitation, supported by AIM Group International as the organizing secretariat. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder, enhanced with plugins such as MonsterInsights for analytics and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, with basic accessibility and SEO features. Hosting and domain registration are transparent and consistent with the event timeline. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and employs a cookie consent mechanism supporting GDPR compliance. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and additional HTTP security headers are absent, representing areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant, but no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences. It effectively supports its business purpose with good content quality and user experience. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and improving accessibility to strengthen the security posture and compliance further.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information
What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention cospar2026.org, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for cospar2026.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with cospar2026.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cospar2026.org.