Skip to main content

Security report for corvaglia.ch

corvaglia group · Manufacturing · Switzerland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

corvaglia group is a medium-sized manufacturing company specializing in innovative cap solutions, including tamper-evident and ergonomic caps, serving a global market from its Swiss base. The company emphasizes expertise across the entire value chain from design to application, with over 30 years of industry presence. Their website reflects a professional digital presence with multilingual support and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, indicating a mature approach to user privacy and compliance. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics tools, offering good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, though explicit security policies and incident response details are absent. The missing WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty about domain registration transparency, but the overall trust signals and contact information support legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and monitoring domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching corvaglia.ch

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention corvaglia.ch, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
4
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for corvaglia.ch.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

corvaglia operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on specialized cap products for packaging industries. Their business model centers on product innovation, quality, and global distribution. The company maintains multiple international offices, indicating a broad market reach. Their digital ecosystem includes strong SEO and marketing integrations, supporting lead generation and brand awareness. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not currently undermine operational credibility. The company leverages social media channels effectively for brand engagement. Growth indicators include recent news updates and investment claims. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness perception. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The use of third-party analytics and marketing pixels is balanced with user consent controls. Security headers beyond HTTPS are not clearly implemented, suggesting room for improvement. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be enhanced with formal documentation and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
corvaglia group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
corvaglia group
Description
Every day, countless people use corvaglia caps. This is what makes our company and what we do so exciting and unusual.
Key services
Cap design, Mold making, Cap production, Cap application solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Owl Carousel, Complianz GDPR plugin, WPML (multilingual)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent management with Complianz plugin

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Analytics, TikTok Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and multilingual support
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management implemented
  4. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools with appropriate consent mechanisms
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  7. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple international offices
  8. No terms of service page found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO for search optimization, WPML for multilingual support, and Complianz for GDPR cookie management. It uses Google Tag Manager to manage analytics and marketing tags, integrating Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and TikTok Pixel for user tracking and marketing insights. The site loads JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components and animations. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and SEO meta tags. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. The site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration but lacks some advanced security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with corvaglia.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review corvaglia.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.