Skip to main content

Security report for corrata.com

Corrata · Technology · Ireland

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Corrata is a technology company specializing in mobile endpoint security, offering advanced threat detection and response solutions tailored for mobile devices. Positioned as a leader in mobile threat defense, Corrata provides services such as mobile phishing protection, malware detection, device trust, adversary-in-the-middle protection, vulnerability management, and web filtering. Their solutions target enterprises and organizations seeking to secure their mobile workforce efficiently and effectively. The website reflects a mature digital presence with well-structured content, modern design, and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR requirements. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with integration of analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, HubSpot, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, ensuring robust data collection and user engagement tracking. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA on forms, though some security headers could be enhanced. Overall, Corrata demonstrates a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance, making it a credible player in the mobile security market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
75/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching corrata.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
75
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Corrata operates a B2B SaaS business model focused on mobile endpoint security, serving medium-sized to enterprise clients primarily in the technology sector. Their competitive advantage lies in their advanced traffic inspection technology and comprehensive mobile threat defense capabilities. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, including recruitment via workable.com, and actively engages with customers through blogs, whitepapers, and threat news. Revenue streams likely include subscriptions and enterprise licensing. The website's content and structure indicate a focus on educating and converting enterprise clients, with clear calls to action for trials and demos. Corrata's market positioning as a next-generation mobile threat defense provider is supported by consistent branding and a professional online presence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not visibly set, which could be improved to enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no publicly visible security or incident response policy, which is a gap in transparency. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, indicating good data protection practices. Overall, the security posture is strong but could benefit from additional header hardening and published incident response information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options headers to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
  4. Enhance data retention disclosures related to analytics and tracking to improve privacy compliance.
  5. Continue to maintain and update privacy and cookie policies in line with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Corrata
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Corrata
Description
Mobile Endpoint Security, Content Filtering without the complexity and compromises of competing solutions. Protect business devices from malicious threats.
Key services
Mobile Phishing Protection, Malware Detection, Device Trust, Adversary-in-the-Middle Protection, Vulnerability Management, Web Filtering
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, reCAPTCHA, Lottie animations, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress theme Bov
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on mobile endpoint security solutions.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  4. Multiple contact channels including email and contact forms.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  7. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using a custom theme (Bov) and integrates multiple modern web technologies including Lottie animations for interactive content and Swiper.js for carousels. Analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, and LinkedIn Insight Tag are used for user tracking and engagement. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve page load times. There is no explicit hosting provider identified from the HTML content. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with corrata.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review corrata.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.