Skip to main content

Security report for copix.ee

Copix · Other · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Copix is a newly established Estonian digital printing company specializing in a wide range of printing services including labels, packaging, interior decoration prints, and book printing. The website is professionally designed using WordPress and Bootstrap, featuring a modern and responsive layout with clear navigation and multiple contact channels. The company targets businesses, schools, publishers, designers, and individual customers, positioning itself as a regional printing service provider with an online ordering platform. The technical infrastructure includes common marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Adform tracking, integrated via Google Tag Manager. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improvement. The domain is newly registered in 2024, consistent with the business launch, and shows no suspicious registration patterns. Overall, the website is functional, trustworthy, and business credible, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching copix.ee

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Copix operates in the printing services sector, focusing on digital print solutions for various customer segments including corporate clients, educational institutions, and individual authors. The business model combines B2B and B2C approaches with an e-commerce platform for convenient ordering. The company leverages partnerships with e-commerce platforms such as epood.copix.ee and epood.grano.ee to extend its market reach. The website content and contact information indicate a small-sized enterprise with a clear local presence in Estonia. The lack of privacy and terms of service pages suggests an opportunity to strengthen compliance and customer trust. Marketing efforts are supported by multiple tracking and advertising tools, indicating an active approach to customer acquisition and engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and implements a cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency in security management. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts introduces potential privacy risks if not properly managed. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by adopting recommended security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and reduce attack surface.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Copix
Description
Copix is a modern digital printing workshop offering a variety of printing products and services including labels, floor stickers, packaging, interior decoration prints, and book printing. They cater to businesses, schools, publishers, designers, and individuals.
Key services
Label printing, Floor stickers and games for schools, Packaging printing, Interior decoration prints, Book printing and publishing services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 5, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Adform tracking, 3D Flipbook plugin, Cookie Law Info plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Adform
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Adform tracking
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, Adform
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with granular controls
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels
  5. Modern WordPress-based site with common marketing and analytics tools
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information
  7. Domain is very new but consistent with business launch
  8. No DNSSEC enabled on domain
  9. No security headers detected in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 5 framework and uses jQuery for scripting. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and advertising tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Adform via Google Tag Manager. The site loads resources from reputable CDNs like jsdelivr and Google Fonts, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. The domain is registered with Zone Media OÜ, an Estonian registrar and likely hosting provider, consistent with the website's regional focus. No critical technical issues or broken elements were detected, but the absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with copix.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review copix.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.